14 DECEMBER 2006

NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No. 172

The Honourable Justice Lowell Patria Goddard, Q.C.,
High Court Judge, of Wellington
as Police Complaints Authority, for a term of five years
commencing on 13 February 2007.

Dated at Wellington this 8th day of December 2006.

HELEN CLARK, Prime Minister.
ps8655

Departmental Notices

Building and Housing

Building Act 2004

Notice Stating Where Material Proposed to be Incorporated by Reference is Available for Inspection and Purchase

Under section 409 (2) (d) of the Building Act 2004, I give notice that the following materials are proposed to be incorporated by reference into an Order in Council made under section 285 of the Building Act 2004, designating classes of licences that may be issued to persons who carry out building work:

NZS 3604:1999 (Incorporating Amendments No. 1 and 2)
“Timber Framed Buildings”

NZS 4229:1999 (Incorporating Amendment No. 1)
“Concrete Masonry Buildings Not Requiring Specific Engineering Design”

Table 3.2: Importance levels for building types –
New Zealand structures from AS/NZS 1170.0:2002
(Incorporating Amendment No. 2)

(collectively referred to as “the material” in this notice).

Availability of material for inspection or purchase

The material is available for inspection free of charge at the Department of Building and Housing, Level Six, 86 Customhouse Quay, Wellington, during the hours of 8.30 a.m. to 5.00 p.m., Monday to Friday, from the date of publication of this notice until Thursday, 25 January 2007 (except for the period 25 December 2006 to 2 January 2007 inclusive).

Copies of the material may also be purchased from Standards New Zealand, Radio New Zealand House, Level Ten, 155 The Terrace, Wellington, or from:

www.standards.co.nz

Comments on proposal

Any person who wishes to comment on the proposal to incorporate the material by reference can send comments to:

Consultation Feedback – Occupational Licensing
Department of Building and Housing
P.O. Box 10-729
Wellington 6143

Comments can emailed to:
lbpconsultation@dbh.govt.nz

or sent by facsimile to: (04) 494 0290.

Comments must be received no later than 5.00 p.m. on Thursday, 25 January 2007.

Dated at Wellington this 5th day of December 2006.

CLAYTON COSGROVE, Minister for Building and Construction.
go8720

Economic Development

Commerce Act 1986

Appointment to the Commerce Commission

Pursuant to section 11 of the Commerce Act 1986, I hereby appoint

Peter Stuart Harris

to be an associate member of the Commerce Commission in respect of matters arising from Part 4A of the Act for a term commencing on 11 December 2006 and expiring on 30 August 2007, unless his term of office as a member of the Electricity Commission ceases, then he ceases to be an associate member of the Commerce Commission on that date.

Dated this 8th day of December 2006.

LIANNE DALZIEL, Minister of Commerce.
go8744

Dumping and Countervailing Duties Act 1988

Anti-dumping Duties: Notice That Anti-dumping Duties on Canned Peaches From South Africa May Cease to Apply

Under section 14 (9) of the Dumping and Countervailing Duties Act 1988 (“the Act”), anti-dumping duties imposed on canned peaches from South Africa* will cease to apply to those goods on 11 June 2007, unless at that date the goods are subject to review under section 14 (8) of the Act.

Any interested party that might request that the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Economic Development initiate a review before the cessation date referred to above, should be aware that positive evidence justifying the need for a review must be provided to the chief executive.

If an application is received which provides positive evidence justifying the need for a review, the chief executive must undertake and complete a review investigation within 180 days of initiation, on whether the anti-dumping duties should continue to be applied.

Positive evidence justifying the need for a review would need to include reasons for believing that the expiration of anti-dumping duties would see the continuation or recurrence of dumping of canned peaches from South Africa, and for believing that such dumping would be likely to cause the continuation or recurrence of material injury to the New Zealand industry producing canned peaches.

The reasons should be supported by evidence and not be based on mere allegations or assertions.