19 SEPTEMBER

NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE

3705

Dosage Form:
Powder for infusion
New Zealand Sponsor:
Eli Lilly and Company (NZ) Limited
Manufacturer:
DSM Pharmaceuticals Inc., Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
Note: This consent is valid for two years from the date of publication of this notice.

Product:
Xigris
Active Ingredient:
Drotrecogin alfa, activated 5mg
Dosage Form:
Powder for infusion
New Zealand Sponsor:
Eli Lilly and Company (NZ) Limited
Manufacturer:
DSM Pharmaceuticals Inc., Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
Note: This consent is valid for two years from the date of publication of this notice.

Dated this 13th day of September 2002.

DR. R. BOYD, Chief Advisor, Safety and Regulation (pursuant to delegation given by the Minister of Health on the 20th day of February 1997

go6406

Inland Revenue

Income Tax Act 1994

Notice of Determination of Tax Depreciation Rates

1. This is a notice made under section EG 14 of the Income Tax Act 1994 of a depreciation determination issued by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue under section EG 10 of that Act.

2. "Determination PROV 10: Tax Depreciation Rates Provisional Determination Number 10" relating to equipment used in the inspection of pipelines was signed on 11 September 2002, and will appear in Inland Revenue’s Tax Information Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 9, of September 2002.

3. A copy of the determination may be obtained by writing to the Manager, Field Liaison & Communication (Adjudication & Rulings), National Office, Inland Revenue, P.O. Box 2198, Wellington.

MARTIN SMITH, General Manager (Adjudication & Rulings).

go6262

Tax Administration Act 1994

Notice of Product Ruling

1. This is a notice of a product ruling made under section 91F of the Tax Administration Act 1994.

2. Product ruling No. 02/09 was issued on 26 July 2002. It relates to the deductibility of the cost of shares acquired by members upon redemption of units in a fund. It will appear in Inland Revenue’s Tax Information Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 9, of September 2002.

3. From 30 September 2002, a copy of the ruling may be obtained by writing to the Manager, Field Liaison & Communication (Adjudication & Rulings), National Office, Inland Revenue, P.O. Box 2198, Wellington.

MARTIN SMITH, General Manager (Adjudication & Rulings).

go6260

Notice of Product Ruling

1. This is a notice of a product ruling made under section 91F of the Tax Administration Act 1994.

2. Product ruling No. 02/10 was issued on 26 July 2002. It relates to a customer trade loyalty programme. It will appear in Inland Revenue’s Tax Information Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 9, of September 2002.

3. From 30 September 2002, a copy of the ruling may be obtained by writing to the Manager, Field Liaison & Communication (Adjudication & Rulings), National Office, Inland Revenue, P.O. Box 2198, Wellington.

MARTIN SMITH, General Manager (Adjudication & Rulings).

go6261

Notice of Product Ruling

1. This is a notice of a product ruling made under section 91F of the Tax Administration Act 1994.

2. Product ruling No. 02/08 was issued on 26 July 2002. It relates to the deductibility of the cost of shares acquired by members upon redemption of units in a fund. It will appear in Inland Revenue’s Tax Information Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 9, of September 2002.

3. From 30 September 2002, a copy of the ruling may be obtained by writing to the Manager, Field Liaison & Communication (Adjudication & Rulings), National Office, Inland Revenue, P.O. Box 2198, Wellington.

MARTIN SMITH, General Manager (Adjudication & Rulings).

go6259

Internal Affairs

Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993

Revocation of Interim Restriction Order

Pursuant to section 69 of the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993, Justice Hammond, in the High Court at Wellington, hereby issues the following notice of revocation of an interim restriction order:

“An interim restriction order made in respect of the film Baise-Moi on 12 April 2002, is revoked in consequence of the decision of the High Court to allow the appeal of the appellant, the Society for the Promotion of Community Standards Inc. Until such