246 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 11

disqualified – and in addition to the sentence imposed on
him, the Court has ordered that a

Holden Premier motor vehicle, registration No. SS 3422
owned by the above-mentioned defendant, be forfeited to
Her Majesty, pursuant to section 84 (4) of the Criminal
Justice Act 1985.
T. M. FRITH, Deputy Registrar.

go707

Order for Confiscation of Motor Vehicle

Pursuant to Section 84 of the Criminal Justice Act 1985

On 23 January 2001 at the District Court at Tauranga,
Shane Neville Cooper, of 7B Kingsley Place,
Mt Maunganui, was convicted of the following offence -
driving with excess breath alcohol – and in addition to the
sentence imposed on him, the Court has ordered that a

Mitsubishi Galant motor vehicle, registration
No. PS 2316

owned by the above-mentioned defendant, be forfeited to
Her Majesty, pursuant to section 84 (4) of the Criminal
Justice Act 1985.
T. M. FRITH, Deputy Registrar.

go704

Economic Development

Dumping and Countervailing Duties Act 1988

Anti-dumping Duties: Notice That Anti-dumping
Duties on Certain Men’s Footwear From China,
Indonesia and Thailand Are to Cease to Apply

Under section 14 (9) of the Dumping and Countervailing
Duties Act 1988 (“the Act”), anti-dumping duties imposed
on certain men’s footwear from China, Indonesia and
Thailand* will cease to apply to those goods on 30 July
2001 unless, at that date, the goods are subject to review
under section 14 (8) of the Act.

Any interested party that might request the Chief Executive
of the Ministry of Economic Development to initiate a
review before the termination date referred to above, should
be aware that positive evidence justifying the need for a
review must be provided to the Chief Executive.

If an application is received which provides positive
evidence justifying the need for a review, the Chief
Executive must undertake and complete a review
investigation, within 180 days of initiation, on whether the
anti-dumping duties should continue to be applied.

Positive evidence justifying the need for a review would
need to provide reasons for believing that the expiration of
anti-dumping duties would see the continuation or
recurrence of dumping of certain men’s footwear from
China, Indonesia and Thailand and for believing that such
dumping would be likely to cause the continuation or
recurrence of material injury to the New Zealand industry
producing certain men’s footwear.

The reasons should be supported by evidence and not based
on mere allegations or assertions.

Further information is available from the Manager,
Trade Remedies Group, Competition and Enterprise
Branch, Ministry of Economic Development, P.O. Box
1473, Wellington, or on facsimile (04) 499 8508 or
email traderem@med.govt.nz

Signed at Wellington this 26th day of January 2001.
R. M. MCLEOD, Manager, Trade Remedies Group.

• Refer to “Final Determination and Imposition of Anti-dumping Duty:
  Certain Men’s Footwear from China, Indonesia, Korea, Taiwan and
  Thailand Amendment No. 1 (Review and Duty Reassessment)” published in
  the New Zealand Gazette of 1 August 1996 at page 2014.

go749

Anti-dumping Duties: Notice That Anti-dumping
Duties on Canned Peaches From South Africa
Are to Cease to Apply

Under section 14 (9) of the Dumping and Countervailing
Duties Act 1988 (“the Act”), anti-dumping duties imposed
on canned peaches from South Africa* will cease to apply to
those goods on 2 August 2001 unless, at that date, the goods
are subject to review under section 14 (8) of the Act.

Any interested party that might request the Chief Executive
of the Ministry of Economic Development to initiate a
review before the cessation date referred to above, should be
aware that positive evidence justifying the need for a review
must be provided to the Chief Executive.

If an application is received which provides positive
evidence justifying the need for a review, the Chief
Executive must undertake and complete a review
investigation, within 180 days of initiation, on whether the
anti-dumping duties should continue to be applied.

Positive evidence justifying the need for a review would
need to provide reasons for believing that the expiration of
anti-dumping duties would see the continuation or
recurrence of dumping of canned peaches from South Africa
and for believing that such dumping would be likely to
cause the continuation or recurrence of material injury to the
New Zealand industry producing canned peaches.

The reasons should be supported by evidence and not based
on mere allegations or assertions.

Further information is available from the Manager,
Trade Remedies Group, Competition and Enterprise
Branch, Ministry of Economic Development, P.O. Box
1473, Wellington, or on facsimile (04) 499 8508 or
email traderem@med.govt.nz

Signed at Wellington this 26th day of January 2001.
R. M. MCLEOD, Manager, Trade Remedies Group.

• Refer to “Final Determination of Dumping Investigation: Canned
  Peaches From South Africa” published in the New Zealand Gazette of
  8 August 1996.

go748

Education

Education Act 1989

The Correspondence School Board of Trustees
Notice 2001

Pursuant to section 95 of the Education Act 1989, I publish
the following notice:

Notice

1. (1) This notice may be cited as The Correspondence
   School Board of Trustees Notice 2001.

(2) This notice shall take effect on 1 April 2001.

2. The Correspondence School Board of Trustees shall be
   constituted as follows:

(a) A chairperson appointed by the Minister of
Education.

(b) Four members appointed by the Minister of
Education.