✨ Electoral Boundary Objections




28 NOVEMBER NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE 3711

Objection 144 T Flack

Objects to the division of the greater Pakuranga area into three electorates.

Suggested solution Suggests that the area of Pakuranga in the proposed Mt Smart and Otara electorates should be joined with the rest of Pakuranga, and that commercial property south of Ti Rakau Road could be placed in the proposed Otara Electoral District. Offers no solution as to the necessary consequential adjustments which would be required to Mt Smart, Howick and adjoining electorates.

Objection 207 D Martin Principal Riverina School

Objects to the inclusion of Pakuranga within the proposed Mt Smart electorate on the grounds of community of interest.

Suggested solution To include Pakuranga with part of the proposed Howick electorate using the Tamaki River as the boundary and putting the new area of East Howick into Hunua.

Objection 208 J D & J Kaye

Objects to the inclusion of Pakuranga in the Mt Smart electorate on the grounds that the area which is not included in the proposed Howick electorate is the original part of the Pakuranga settlement and contains the main shopping centre of Pakuranga.

Suggested solution The Tamaki estuary should be the western boundary of the proposed electorate. The southern boundary should also be moved so as to give Howick room to expand east towards Clevedon and Hunua. This would retain existing communities of interest.

Objection 340 P & J Aley

Objects to the inclusion of Western Pakuranga (bounded from the proposed Howick electorate by St Kentigern College, Pakuranga Highway and Gossamer Drive) in the proposed Mt Smart electorate.

Suggested solution Pakuranga remains intact as an electorate. If population requirements preclude this then all or part of Howick could be included in the Pakuranga area. The natural boundaries of the Tamaki River and Pakuranga Creek should be held so that the developing area of East Howick may expand without future alteration to the existing Howick and Pakuranga electorates.

Objection 358 D J Catley

Objects to the boundary between Howick and Mt Smart on the grounds that it breaches community of interest, facilities of communication, and topographic feature criteria. Objector details communities of interest between Pakuranga and Howick.



Next Page →

PDF embedding disabled (Crown copyright)

View this page online at:


VUW Te Waharoa PDF NZ Gazette 1994, No 126


NZLII PDF NZ Gazette 1994, No 126





✨ LLM interpretation of page content

πŸ›οΈ Objection to Electoral Boundaries - Pakuranga Area

πŸ›οΈ Governance & Central Administration
Electoral Districts, Boundary Change, Pakuranga, Objection 144
  • T Flack, Objected to electoral division of Pakuranga

πŸ›οΈ Objection to Electoral Boundaries - Pakuranga Community of Interest

πŸ›οΈ Governance & Central Administration
Electoral Districts, Boundary Change, Pakuranga, Objection 207
  • D Martin, Objected to Pakuranga in Mt Smart electorate

πŸ›οΈ Objection to Electoral Boundaries - Pakuranga Shopping Centre

πŸ›οΈ Governance & Central Administration
Electoral Districts, Boundary Change, Pakuranga, Objection 208
  • J D Kaye, Objected to Pakuranga in Mt Smart electorate
  • J Kaye, Objected to Pakuranga in Mt Smart electorate

πŸ›οΈ Objection to Electoral Boundaries - Western Pakuranga

πŸ›οΈ Governance & Central Administration
Electoral Districts, Boundary Change, Pakuranga, Objection 340
  • P Aley, Objected to Western Pakuranga in Mt Smart electorate
  • J Aley, Objected to Western Pakuranga in Mt Smart electorate

πŸ›οΈ Objection to Electoral Boundaries - Howick and Mt Smart

πŸ›οΈ Governance & Central Administration
Electoral Districts, Boundary Change, Howick, Objection 358
  • D J Catley, Objected to Howick and Mt Smart boundary