✨ Research Funding Criteria
NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No. 122 – 11 NOVEMBER 2015
a. Impact.
i. Benefit to New Zealand (weighted 25%). Research should have direct and indirect benefits or effect on individuals, communities or society as a whole, including broad benefits to New Zealand’s economic, social, human or natural capital. Assessment must have particular regard to:
a. The credibility of the need for, scale and extent of potential benefits from the proposed research, science or technology or related activities; and
b. the relevance and additional value they deliver to New Zealand; and
ii. Implementation Pathway(s) (weighted 25%). The credibility of implementation pathway(s) to deliver public benefits to New Zealand, not limited to a single firm or end user, and the strength of relationships with relevant end users, beneficiaries, or stakeholders.
- When assessing proposals, the extent to which a proposal is likely to meet the following must be taken into account:
a. General policy objectives set out in clause 2 of the main notice and specific policy objective set out in clause 1 of this schedule including, where appropriate, the Vision Mātauranga policy.
PUBLISHED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS
PRINTED BY BLUE STAR GROUP
newzealand.govt.nz
INTERNAL AFFAIRS
Te Tari Taiwhenua
ISSN 0111-5650 (PRINT)
ISSN 1177-8415 (ONLINE)
NZ Gazette 2015, No 122
✨ LLM interpretation of page content
🎓
MBIE Contestable Research Fund Notice to the Science Board
(continued from previous page)
🎓 Education, Culture & Science6 November 2015
Research, Science, Technology, Funding, MBIE, Science Board, Contestable Research Fund, Research, Science and Technology Act 2010