✨ Electoral Boundary Objections
92 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No. 3 14 JANUARY 2014
N17-015 b, h
Objection Point England School
Objects to splitting the Tāmaki community between two electorates. Point England School and Tamaki College and their families will be split. It will also make Tāmaki redevelopment more difficult to organise.
Suggested solution: Ensure the Tāmaki electorate includes all of the suburbs of Glen Innes, Point England and Panmure.
N17-016 b, h
Objection S Solomon
Objects to proposed boundaries splitting Panmure and Tamaki as single representation is needed for this area’s social and economic issues.
Suggested solution: Keep the existing boundaries.
N17-017 b
Objection G Turner
Objects to the continued split in the suburbs of Glen Innes, Point England, Tamaki and Panmure. The suburbs are all covered by the urban redevelopment programme.
Suggested solution: Ensure Glen Innes, Point England, Tamaki and Panmure are reunited in a single Tāmaki electorate.
N17-018 b
Objection G Thompson
Objects to splitting the Tamaki community between two electorates. It is a cohesive community with common interests.
N17-019 b, h
Objection United Future NZ Party, Auckland Branch
Objects to the exclusion of the area east of Onehunga Mall and Grand Drive from the Maungakiekie electorate. This area is an integral part of the One Tree Hill suburb and the proposed boundary splits this community of interest.
Objects to the inclusion of the Westfield area in Maungakiekie, which has closer links to Otahuhu than to Mt Wellington.
Suggested solution: Retain the area east of Onehunga Mall and Grand Drive (south of Bollard Avenue, west of Moana Avenue and north of Mt Smart Road) in Maungakiekie. Instead, exclude the area of Manukau East south of the Main Trunk Railway line (Westfield to Sylvia Park) and west of the Southern Motorway.
N17-020 b, h
Objection Onehunga Business Association
Objects to the removal of the western areas of the Maungakiekie electorate and the growth of the electorate to the south-east. The area has been compromised with representation in the Auckland Council, and these changes will further split a community in two – threatening the effectiveness of representation.
N17-021 b, h
Objection E Puni
Objects to the inclusion of northern Otahuhu in the Maungakiekie electorate. This community is more affiliated with the community of Manukau and the proposed boundary splits the community in two. Students at schools such as Panama Road School, Otahuhu Intermediate, Mt Richmond School and Otahuhu School will live in separate electorates from their school.
Suggested solution: Return the boundary to the current boundary agreed upon in 2007.
N17-022 b, h
Objection S Solomon
Objects to the movement of the Maungakiekie electorate boundaries as the electorate is very diverse and vibrant and changing the boundaries could affect its economic growth.
Suggested solution: Keep the existing boundaries.
Next Page →
NZ Gazette 2014, No 3
✨ LLM interpretation of page content
🏛️
Objections to Electoral Boundary Changes
(continued from previous page)
🏛️ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral districts, boundary objections, Maungakiekie, Tāmaki, Panmure, Point England, Onehunga, Otahuhu
- S Solomon, Objects to proposed boundaries splitting Panmure and Tamaki
- G Turner, Objects to the continued split in the suburbs of Glen Innes, Point England, Tamaki and Panmure
- G Thompson, Objects to splitting the Tamaki community between two electorates
- E Puni, Objects to the inclusion of northern Otahuhu in the Maungakiekie electorate