✨ Science Funding Criteria
31 JANUARY 2014 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No. 12 289
(iv) build on the existing research and research strategies being undertaken in New Zealand, and internationally?
(v) outline how it will contribute to and interact with related research in the Challenge, including embedding relevant Crown research institute core funding as additional funding of the proposed research?
(vi) include private co-funding and other funding and support for the proposed research from other sources?
(vii) outline how it will work with other Challenges where relevant?
(viii) make best use of existing capabilities and competencies of key New Zealand research organisations?
(ix) reflect the needs of end-users?
(x) give effect to the Vision Mātauranga policy in clause 3?
(b) The research, science, and technology will be excellent quality
Key questions: To what extent does the proposal:
(i) make best use of the skills and expertise of key New Zealand researchers to deliver the Challenge objective and outcomes (under the themes)?
(ii) leverage the skills and experience of international researchers and the capacities of international research organisations?
(iii) build the current and future skills and expertise of the New Zealand researchers to deliver the Challenge objective and outcomes (under the themes)?
(iv) allow for the dynamic introduction of new capability, research and researchers into the Challenge?
(v) outline activities that will contribute to outstanding science quality?
(vi) include a portfolio of research with an appropriate balance of incremental and high-risk, high-return research?
(vii) outline transparent and robust processes used to identify, assess, prioritise and select the proposed research to meet the Challenge objective and outcomes (under the themes)?
(viii) outline methods for ensuring on-going quality assurance in delivering the research?
(ix) give effect to the Vision Mātauranga policy in clause 3?
(c) The governance, management, and financial arrangements are sound and enduring
Key questions: To what extent do the proposed governance, management, and financial structures (as outlined in the business plan):
(i) provide a governance entity for the Challenge that has access to the necessary experience, track record, capability and resources to assume responsibility for co-ordinating, monitoring, and managing the proposed collaboration?
Next Page →
NZ Gazette 2014, No 12
✨ LLM interpretation of page content
🎓
Criteria for Proposals for National Science Challenges Funding
(continued from previous page)
🎓 Education, Culture & ScienceResearch, Science, Technology, Funding, Proposals, Eligibility, Assessment, Governance, Quality Assurance