β¨ Research Funding Criteria
8 NOVEMBER 2013 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No.148 4071
| Benefits to New Zealand | Risk Management or Success Factors |
|---|---|
| Outcome benefits to New Zealand | Implementation pathway |
| Key Questions: | Key Question: |
| To what extent would the proposed research, science, or technology, or related activities create benefits for New Zealand? | To what extent does the proposal provide for engagement across multiple users and potential or proposed implementation through multiple channels, having regard for the stage of the development of the enabling technology? |
| To what extent are there multiple opportunities arising from the technology platform? | |
| Benefits to New Zealand of research, science, or technology, or related activities | Ability to deliver results (outputs) from research, science, or technology, or related activities |
| Key Questions: | Key Question: |
| What is the quality of the proposed research, science, or technology, or related activities? | What is the likelihood that the proposed outputs of the research, science, or technology, or related activities will be achieved? |
| To what extent could the proposed research, science, or technology, or related activities develop a platform of underpinning, enabling technologies that have multiple applications and many connections across science and business? | |
| To what extent would the proposed research, science, or technology, or related activities generate new knowledge? |
3. Other assessment criteria
The Science Board may allocate funding under the Enabling Technologies investment mechanism only:
(a) in medium to large scale funding amounts of between $1.5 and $3 million (excluding GST) per year for up to six years; or
(b) in lower value sector development funding amounts of under $250,000 (excluding GST) to assist the applicant in developing its engagement with a sector in order to realise the commercial potential of its research, science, or technology, or related activities.
Next Page →
β¨ LLM interpretation of page content
π
Smart Ideas Phase 2 Funding Assessment Criteria
(continued from previous page)
π Education, Culture & ScienceResearch, Funding, Science, Technology, Assessment Criteria, Phase 2, Novelty, Global Scope
NZ Gazette 2013, No 148