β¨ Research Funding Criteria
NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No. 146
5 DECEMBER 2012
Specific Assessment Criteria for Smart Ideas Phase 1 Funding
Benefits to New Zealand
Outcome benefits to New Zealand
Key Question:
To what extent could the proposed research, science, and technology, or related activities create benefits for New Zealand?
Weighting 10%
Benefits to New Zealand of research, science and technology, or related activities
Key Questions:
How novel* is the idea?
What is the quality of the proposed research, science, and technology, or related activities?
Weighting 55%
*See clause 4.2 of this schedule for information about what constitutes a novel idea for the purpose of this schedule.
Risk Management or Success Factors
Implementation pathway
Key Question:
To what extent might there be applications or markets for the idea if the idea were successfully developed?
Weighting 10%
Ability to deliver results (outputs) from research, science, and technology, or related activities
Key Question:
What is the likelihood that the proposed outputs of the research, science, and technology, or related activities will be achieved?
Weighting 25%
Specific Assessment Criteria for Smart Ideas Phase 2 Funding
Benefits to New Zealand
Outcome benefits to New Zealand
Key Question:
To what extent could the proposed research, science, and technology, or related activities create benefits for New Zealand?
Weighting 25%
Benefits to New Zealand of research, science, and technology, or related activities
Key Questions:
How novel* is the idea?
What is the quality of the proposed research, science, and technology, or related activities?
Weighting 30%
*See clause 4.2 of this schedule for information about what constitutes a novel idea for the purpose of this schedule.
Risk Management or Success Factors
Implementation pathway
Key Question:
To what extent does the proposal identify market opportunities for the idea?
Weighting 25%
Ability to deliver results (outputs) from research, science, and technology, or related activities
Key Question:
What is the likelihood that the proposed outputs of the research, science, and technology, or related activities will be achieved?
Weighting 20%
Next Page →
β¨ LLM interpretation of page content
π Specific Assessment Criteria for Smart Ideas Phase 1 Funding
π Education, Culture & ScienceResearch Funding, Innovation, Science, Technology, Assessment Criteria
π Specific Assessment Criteria for Smart Ideas Phase 2 Funding
π Education, Culture & ScienceResearch Funding, Innovation, Science, Technology, Assessment Criteria
NZ Gazette 2012, No 146