New Zealand Gazette – 2012 – No. 146

Page 4229

✨ Science Funding Criteria



5 DECEMBER 2012 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No. 146 4229

supplying administrative services to the Science Board under section 10(7) of the Research, Science, and Technology Act 2012.

2.3 The areas of research, science, and technology, or related activities referred to in clause 2.2(a) are derived from the 2013 Sector Investment Plans developed for each relevant research fund. These provide the strategic context for the investment priorities, research questions and other requirements.

  1. CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSALS UNDER 2013 SCIENCE INVESTMENT ROUND

3.1 A proposal assessed as having met the eligibility criteria in clause 2.2 must be assessed in accordance with the criteria set out in the Science-led Contestable Tool, including the criteria specific to the relevant Investment Mechanism.

3.2 When having regard to how the proposal contributes to the mix of investments in respect of the relevant research fund for the purposes of clause 6(e) of the Science-led Contestable Tool, the Science Board must have regard, in addition to the matters listed in clause 6(e), to the extent to which the overall mix of investments is likely to best deliver research, science, and technology, or related activities in the areas set out in the relevant schedule to this notice.

3.3 The Science Board must make funding decisions that are consistent with any applicable requirements specified in the relevant schedule.

  1. 2013 SANDPIT ROUND: ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND OTHER MATTERS

4.1 Funding is available under the 2013 Sandpit round for research, science, and technology, or related activities that meet the eligibility criteria specified in clause 4.2.

4.2 For a proposal to be assessed in accordance with clause 5, the proposal must:

(a) be to undertake research, science, and technology, or related activities that are in an area specified in Schedule 5 of this notice;

(b) meet any requirements specified in Schedule 5 of this notice;

(c) meet any eligibility criteria specified in the notice entitled "Criteria for Proposals Generated by a Sandpit Process" published in the Supplement to the New Zealand Gazette, 5 December 2012, No. 146, page 4251 (the "Sandpit Tool"); and

(d) meet any applicable timing, formatting, system or other similar administrative requirements imposed by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment in supplying administrative services to the Science Board under section 10(7) of the Research, Science, and Technology Act 2012.

4.3 The areas of research, science, and technology, or related activities referred to in clause 4.2(a) are derived from the 2013 Sector Investment Plan for the Environmental Research Fund. This provides the strategic context for the investment priorities, research questions and other requirements.

  1. CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSALS UNDER 2013 SANDPIT ROUND

5.1 A proposal assessed as having met the eligibility criteria in clause 4.2 must be assessed in accordance with the criteria set out in the Sandpit Tool.

5.2 The Science Board must make funding decisions that are consistent with any requirements specified in Schedule 5 of this notice.



Next Page →



Online Sources for this page:

Gazette.govt.nz — PDF NZ Gazette 2012, No 146




✨ LLM interpretation of page content

🎓 Criteria for proposals generated by a Sandpit process (continued from previous page)

🎓 Education, Culture & Science
Science, Sandpit, Proposals, Criteria