✨ Science Funding Criteria and Administrative Processes




194 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No. 9 31 JANUARY 2011

  • make funding decisions consistent with the criteria specific to each investment tool, which are:
    • Objective of the tool
    • Eligibility criteria
    • Judgement criteria
    • Weightings for judgement criteria
    • Parameters specific to the tool.

In addition to the criteria listed above, the Science Board must take into account the overall mix of relevant investments. Detailed criteria specific to each investment tool are set out in more detail in the following pages.

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES

The Ministry of Science and Innovation may issue standing or periodic calls to generate proposals for consideration by the Board. The calls for proposals will be consistent with the criteria above, and will provide guidance for applicants. This guidance may include, where applicable:

  • the area(s) of investment in which a funding decision is required
  • more detail as to how the criteria in this notice apply to the area of investment
  • the investment tool (or initiative within the investment tool) to be used
  • the amount of funding available
  • specific outcomes sought for a given investment process or decision
  • other timeline and process information.

Calls for proposals will be published on the Ministry of Science and Innovation website:
http://www.msi.govt.nz/



Next Page →



Online Sources for this page:

Gazette.govt.nz PDF NZ Gazette 2011, No 9





✨ LLM interpretation of page content

πŸŽ“ Science Board Criteria for Assessing Research Funding Proposals (continued from previous page)

πŸŽ“ Education, Culture & Science
Research Funding, Science Board, Criteria, Investment Tools, Objective, Eligibility, Judgement, Weightings, Parameters

πŸŽ“ Administrative Processes for Research Funding Proposals

πŸŽ“ Education, Culture & Science
Funding Proposals, Administrative Processes, Ministry of Science and Innovation, Calls for Proposals, Investment Tools, Outcomes, Timeline