2 APRIL 2009 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No. 46 1079

11. Section 80, being all the land in Deeds Index 9/2 granted to Frederick Bullot under Crown Grant 6057 dated 31 July 1871.

12. Section 83, being all the land in Deeds Index 9/132 granted to William Joseph Furlong under Crown Grant 6765 dated 16 November 1872.

13. Section 95, being all the land in Deeds Index 9/148 granted to George Scammel under Crown Grant 7140 dated 12 February 1872.

14. Section 99, being all the land in Deeds Index 9/128 granted to James Rowe under Crown Grant 6656 dated 12 February 1872.

15. Section 102, being all the land in Deeds Index 9/1 granted to Arscott Bayly under Crown Grant 6180 dated 31 July 1871.

16. Section 103, being all the land in Deeds Index 9/187 granted to Joseph Hogan under Crown Grant 9032 dated 8 August 1871.

17. Section 104, being all the land in Deeds Index 9/127 granted to George Elliot under Crown Grant 6655 dated 12 February 1872.

18. Section 124, being all the land in Deeds Index 9/78 granted to Patricio Grive Wilson under Crown Grant 6028 dated 31 July 1871.

19. Section 125, being all the land in Deeds Index 9/57 granted to Martin Stagpool under Crown Grant 6372 dated 10 July 1871.

20. Section 132, being all the land in Deeds Index 9/141 granted to James Kelly under Crown Grant 9034 dated 8 August 1871.

21. Section 133, being all the land in unregistered Crown Grant 1549 dated 12 February 1872 and granted to James Smith.

22. Section 160, being all the land in Deeds Index 9/198 granted to Henry Dewar under Crown Grant 11241 dated 12 February 1872.

Dated at the Hamilton Office of Land Information New Zealand this 24th day of March 2009.

MARTIN COLE, for Registrar-General of Land.

Land Transfer Act Notice

I hereby give notice of an application lodged with me for the issue of a Computer Freehold Register to the below-named applicant, under section 19 of the Land Transfer Act 1952, for the land described below.

Such Computer Freehold Register may be issued unless caveat forbidding the same is lodged on or before 4 May 2009.

Application: 8079767.1.

Applicant: Ian Holman Reed, c/o Dallison Stone, Solicitors, Level 8, BNZ Building, 137 Armagh Street, Christchurch.

Description: An estate in fee simple in 2884 square metres, being part Rural Section 3924, Canterbury Land District, which is the residue of the land remaining in Deeds Index 135D/831, such land being part of the land granted to George Rutherford, under Crown Grant 87706 on 9 June 1894, who is recorded as being the documentary owner thereof.

Dated at the Hamilton Office of Land Information New Zealand this 26th day of March 2009.

ROSS HURLY, for Registrar-General of Land.

Notice Pursuant to Section 70 of the Land Transfer Act 1952

The applicant described below has applied, under section 70 of the Land Transfer Act 1952, for the removal of a pedestrian right of way. The applicant claims the pedestrian right of way is redundant by reason of the circumstances set out below.

I intend to remove the pedestrian right of way on 7 May 2009 if no objections have been received before that date.

Application: 8057608.1.

Applicant: Chews Lane Developments Limited, c/o Morrison Kent, PO Box 10035, Wellington.

Easement: Pedestrian right of way over Lot 1 DP 363521; marked "A" on DP 363521 (comprised in Computer Freehold Register 258139) appurtenant to Lot 3 DP 389044 (comprised in Computer Interest Register 410925), created by easement instrument 6856094.14, registered on 8 May 2006.

Circumstances: The dominant tenement has become physically separated from the servient tenement caused by the airspace that exists above the existing buildings on the servient tenement. The location of the airspace is marked "A" on DP 389044.

Dated at the Christchurch Office of Land Information New Zealand this 23rd day of March 2009.

H. E. FRISBY, for Registrar-General of Land.

Notice Pursuant to Section 70 of the Land Transfer Act 1952

The applicant described below has applied, under section 70 of the Land Transfer Act 1952, for the removal of a pedestrian right of way. The applicant claims the pedestrian right of way is redundant by reason of the circumstances set out below.

I intend to remove the pedestrian right of way on 7 May 2009 if no objections have been received before that date.