✨ Overseas Investment Guidelines
15 NOVEMBER 2007
NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No. 123
investments unless compliance should reasonably be
excused. In deciding whether compliance with a specific
condition should be excused, consideration should be
given to any realised benefits and the extent to which
compliance with a particular condition may be out of the
applicant’s control.
-
In exercising its powers under subpart 4 (Monitoring)
of the Act, the regulator should monitor compliance
with the conditions of consent for at least five years or
until in the opinion of the regulator the benefits have
been realised or compliance has reasonably been
excused, whichever is the earlier. Within the monitoring
period, the regulator may decide how frequently it
should monitor (for example once, biannually, annually
or biennially) based upon a risk assessment and
consideration of suitable completion benchmarks. -
The exercise of powers under subpart 5 (Enforcement)
of the Act is at the regulator’s discretion.
Parks, Reserves and Other Sensitive Land
-
Under section 37 of the Act the regulator must compile
and keep a list (the list) of reserves, public parks, and
other areas described in the section. Such land has the
effect of making land sensitive. It is expected that you,
as the regulator, would ensure that this list is kept up to
date by amending its content as required. -
In determining what to include on the list, consideration
should be given to designations under any relevant
gazette notice, regional or district plans, or proposed
district plans. Reserves of a less sensitive nature, most of
which are likely to be local purpose or government
purpose reserves, such as drainage or hospital reserves,
would not normally need to be included. -
National Parks under the National Parks Act 1980,
wildlife management reserves, foreshore reserves, and
lake or riverfront reserves must be included on the list. -
The area screening threshold applied to any land listed as
sensitive under section 37 should be 0.4 hectares in order
to be consistent with the area thresholds that apply to
similar types of land in Table 2, Part 1 of Schedule I of
the Act. If the land on the list adjoins other land on this
list, or land in Table 2 that is held for similar purposes,
the land areas can be aggregated for calculating the area
threshold.
Intention to Reside in New Zealand Indefinitely
-
Overseas investment policy must be consistent with and
reinforce New Zealand’s immigration policy, which
aims to attract skilled migrants. Under section 16(1)(e)(i)
of the Act, overseas persons intending to reside in
New Zealand indefinitely are not required to show
that their investment is likely to benefit New Zealand
because that ownership of land will assist new migrants
to settle in New Zealand and that the benefits of the
proposed migration will be considered under immigration
legislation. -
An intention to reside in New Zealand indefinitely must
involve a definite plan and accompanying action within a
reasonable time frame. In determining whether a person
is intending to reside indefinitely the regulator must give
consideration to any active steps that have been taken by
the investor to actually reside in New Zealand. In order
for the section 16(1)(e)(i) criterion to apply, the applicant
must:
a. have applied to Immigration New Zealand for a visa
or permit under any of Immigration New Zealand’s
residence policies; and
b. provide the regulator with evidence that the
application for the visa or permit is likely to be
successful; and
3245
c. show other actions consistent with an intent to reside
in New Zealand in the near future.
- The regulator may impose a time limit within
which the applicant must become permanently resident
in New Zealand. As a general rule the Government
would expect that this would require that the overseas
person must be resident in New Zealand within five
years of the date of application.
Part Two: Special Land
- Section 17(2)(f) of the Act requires that Ministers must
consider whether any special land has been offered to the
Crown in accordance with the Regulations. Special land
is defined under Regulation 12 of the Overseas Investment
Regulations 2005 (“the Regulations”) as being “the
foreshore, seabed, riverbed, or lakebed”.
Government’s General Policy Approach to Special Land
- The Crown may acquire special land to either recognise
the attitude of New Zealanders to that land or class of
land or to protect or preserve that land for future
generations. Thus in recommending to purchase special
land advice must consider the Government’s general
policy approach, which is to:
(a) Recognise an attitude of New Zealanders to a
piece or type of special land
Where the Crown chooses to acquire special land
in order to recognise the attitude of New Zealanders
(or a group of New Zealanders), these attitudes
could relate to a specific piece of special land or
may relate to a more general class of special land,
eg foreshore or seabed. The regulator is not expected
to provide advice beyond recognising that an attitude
may exist in New Zealand to that land.
(b) Protect, recognise or preserve some value that
can best be protected by Crown ownership
In making recommendations to Ministers as to
whether or not to acquire special land in order
to recognise or preserve some value that can best
be protected by Crown ownership, the regulator is
required to consider all relevant matters set out
under the heading “Matters for Consideration”,
taking into account the particular circumstances of
the special land.
- There is a presumption that special land will be acquired
by the Crown where it is offered to the Crown for nil
consideration, and the costs and liabilities associated
with the acquisition do not outweigh the benefits, and
there is no negative or only a negligible impact on the
overseas investment transaction.
Acquisition and Waiver
-
Special land includes land that forms part of the owner’s
registered freehold title to the relevant land or that
is held under common law (in relation to riverbed or
lakebed) by the owner under the ad medium filum aquae
rule. -
In circumstances where a river is navigable, the Crown
will already own the riverbed. Due to the problems of
determining the navigability of a river the regulator is
not expected to consider whether a river is navigable
within its advice to Ministers. For this reason, the
regulator should make clear on its website, in advice,
and any supporting documentation that the decision to
acquire or not acquire special land for whatever purpose
is not a statement inferred or implied about whether a
river is or is not navigable, or whether the Crown does or
does not own the special land in question. Further, any
decision will be based purely on consideration of the
merits of only the piece of land in question and so any
decision will not imply the status of any other property.
Next Page →
Online Sources for this page:
VUW Te Waharoa —
NZ Gazette 2007, No 123
Gazette.govt.nz —
NZ Gazette 2007, No 123
✨ LLM interpretation of page content
💰
Publication of Ministerial Directive Letter Under Section 35 of the Overseas Investment Act 2005
(continued from previous page)
💰 Finance & Revenue31 October 2007
Overseas Investment Act 2005, Ministerial Directive, Economic Growth, Sustainable Development, Land Acquisition, Public Access, Biodiversity