27 JULY 2006

NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No. 85

2639

Land Transfer Act / Joint Family Homes Act Notices

Land Transfer Act Notice

Notice is hereby given that a Computer Freehold Register will be issued in the names of the applicants described below for the parcel of land hereinafter described, pursuant to section 3 of the Land Transfer Amendment Act 1963, unless a caveat is lodged forbidding the same at the expiry of one month from the date of publication of this notice in the New Zealand Gazette.

Application: 6831664.1.

Applicants: Walter Baker and Ahu Alicia Baker, care of Clive Patterson, Barrister & Solicitor, 117 Commerce Street, Kaitaia.

Description of Land: A 3/9th share in 7613 square metres, being part Whakakoro B2A Block and being the land Computer Freehold Register NA21A/1109.

Dated at the Auckland Office of Land Information New Zealand this 18th day of July 2006.

JOEL T. M. FOTU, for Registrar-General of Land.

lt5059

Land Transfer Act Notice

I hereby give notice of an application lodged with me for the issue of a Computer Freehold Register to the below-named applicant, under section 19 of the Land Transfer Act 1952, for the land described below. Such Computer Freehold Register may be issued unless caveat forbidding the same is lodged on or before the 31st day of August 2006.

Application: 6948220.1.

Applicant: E-Mouse Holdings Limited.

Description: For an estate in fee simple in 74 square metres, being part of Section 727, Town of Wellington, which is the land remaining in Deeds Index, Volume 16, folio 263, to Joseph Stevenson, and being the land now shown as Lot 1 on a Plan for Deposit in the Wellington Land Registry, under 359623.

Circumstances: Such land being part of the land granted by the Crown on the 15th day of August 1853, and recorded in Crown Grant, Volume 1, page 169.

Dated at the Wellington Office of Land Information New Zealand this 27th day of July 2006.

ROBERT WESTLEY, for Registrar-General of Land.

lt4980

General Notices

Notice of Decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal

of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
New Zealand (Member Guilty of Misconduct in
a Professional Capacity and Breaching the
Rules and/or Code of Ethics of the Institute)

At a hearing of the Disciplinary Tribunal of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of New Zealand held in public on the 3rd and 4th days of July 2006, at which the member was in attendance and represented by counsel, Leon Paul Hendren, of Christchurch, pleaded guilty to the following charges (1) and (4) and admitted the following particulars 1.1 (a), (b), (c), (d), 1.2 (a), (b), (c), (d) and 2.1, and the tribunal found particular 2.2 proven. Charges (2), (3) and (5) were withdrawn by the prosecution.

Charges

THAT in terms of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of New Zealand Act 1996 and the Rules made thereunder, and in particular Rule 21.30, Leon Paul Hendren is guilty of:

(1) misconduct in a professional capacity; and/or
(2) (withdrawn);
(3) (withdrawn);
(4) breaching the Rules and/or Code of Ethics of the Institute; and/or
(5) (withdrawn).

Particulars

IN THAT in relation to being a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of New Zealand and in relation to a complaint, the member:

1.1 was professionally associated with an invitation to invest money to the public and/or prospective investors when he knew, or after reasonable enquiry ought to have known, that the invitation did not give a full and fair statement in relation to:

(a) the nature of the rights that were to be purchased by Partnership A from Company B; and/or
(b) the right to claim depreciation in accordance with the Income Tax Act 1994; and/or
(c) the true value of the rights that were being transferred and/or the purchase price to be paid by Partnership A; and/or
(d) the estimated future results for Partnership A for the years ended 31 March 1998 to 31 March 2007.
(Code of Ethics 1995 – FP 1; and/or FP 2; and/or FP 5; and/or FP 7; and/or EP 8.4; and/or EP 22; and/or EP 29; and/or EP 31.)

1.2 made representations or caused representations to be made to one or more prospective investors in Partnership A which failed to present the information fully and/or honestly and/or professionally so that such