New Zealand Gazette – 2006 – No. 162

Page 4725

✨ Audit Opinion



1 DECEMBER 2006
NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No. 162
4725

Deloitte

AUDITOR-GENERAL’S OPINION ON THE PERFORMANCE MEASURES OF MARLBOROUGH LINES LIMITED LINES BUSINESS

We have examined the information being:

(a) a derivation table; and

(b) the annual ODV reconciliation report; and

(c) financial performance measures; and

(d) financial components of the efficiency performance measures,

that were prepared by Marlborough Lines Limited Lines Business and dated 31 March 2006 for the purposes of the Commerce Commission’s Electricity Information Disclosure Requirements 2004.

In our opinion, having made all reasonable enquiry, to the best of our knowledge, that information has been prepared in accordance with those Electricity Information Disclosure Requirements 2004 expect for requirement 14(2)b that requires comparative information for financial performance measures to be adjusted so as to be consistent with accounting policies applied in the current financial year. The non-compliance with requirement 14(2)b of the Commerce Commission’s Electricity Information Disclosure Requirements 2004 impacts on the financial performance measure in Clause 1 of Part 3 of Schedule 1 as outlined on each schedule.

Michael Wilkes
Deloitte
Appointed Auditor
On behalf of the Auditor-General
Wellington, New Zealand
22 November 2006



Next Page →



Online Sources for this page:

VUW Te Waharoa — PDF NZ Gazette 2006, No 162


Gazette.govt.nz — PDF NZ Gazette 2006, No 162




✨ LLM interpretation of page content

🏭 Marlborough Lines Limited Financial Statements Audit (continued from previous page)

🏭 Trade, Customs & Industry
22 November 2006
Audit, Financial Statements, Unqualified Opinion, Electricity Information Disclosure, Marlborough Lines Limited
  • Michael Wilkes, Appointed Auditor