✨ Audit Report
23 AUGUST 2005 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE, No. 138 3357
Deloitte
AUDITOR-GENERAL’S OPINION ON THE PERFORMANCE MEASURES OF MARLBOROUGH LINES LIMITED – LINES BUSINESS
We have examined the information being:
(a) the derivation table in Requirement 15; and
(b) the annual ODV reconciliation report in Requirement 16; and
(c) the financial performance measures in Clause 1 of Part 3 of Schedule 1; and
(d) the financial components of the efficiency performance measures in Clause 2 of Part 3 of Schedule 1,
that were prepared by Marlborough Lines Limited – Lines Business and dated 31 March 2005 for the purposes of the Commerce Commission’s Electricity Information Disclosure Requirements 2004.
In our opinion, having made all reasonable enquiry, to the best of our knowledge, that information has been prepared in accordance with those Electricity Information Disclosure Requirements 2004 except for requirement 14(2)b that requires comparative information for financial performance measures to be adjusted so as to be consistent with accounting policies applied in the current financial year. The non-compliance with requirement 14(2)b of the Commerce Commission’s Electricity Information Disclosure Requirements 2004 impacts on the financial performance measures in Clause 1 of Part 3 of Schedule 1 as outlined on each schedule.

G. R. Mitchell
Deloitte
On behalf of the Auditor-General
Wellington, New Zealand
16 August 2005
Next Page →
Online Sources for this page:
VUW Te Waharoa —
NZ Gazette 2005, No 138
Gazette.govt.nz —
NZ Gazette 2005, No 138
✨ LLM interpretation of page content
💰
Audit Report for Marlborough Lines Limited – Lines Business
(continued from previous page)
💰 Finance & Revenue16 August 2005
Audit, Financial Performance Measures, Marlborough Lines Limited, Deloitte, Commerce Commission
- G. R. Mitchell, Deloitte, On behalf of the Auditor-General