β¨ Electoral Objections and Suggestions
NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE
No. 63
1460
Suggested solution That the boundary could be the Eltham Town Boundary as far as the Main Road and then up to the Main Road 1 or 2 kilometres to the South Taranaki District Council Boundary which crosses the Main Road.
30 002 b,h
Objection I Mauriri
Objects to Normanby residents not being included in the proposed Whanganui Electorate. Reasons are that the government agencies are represented in Hawera and Normanby residentsβ dealings are in Hawera which is located in the Whanganui Electorate.
Suggested solutions People of Normanby would be best served by being brought into the Whanganui Electorate.
30 003 b
Objection J Murphy and 32 others
Objects to the Normanby area not being included in the proposed Whanganui Electorate. The reasons as put forward in 1995 and accepted by the Representation Commission have not changed but the situation now is that there is no problem with the quota for Whanganui. It makes no sense to include the great majority of Normanby residents in the vast electorate of Taranaki-King Country when most business, personal, social and sporting affiliations are to Hawera.
Suggested solutions To exclude from Taranaki-King Country the areas bound by the Waingongoro River, the Main Road and the Mawhitiwhiti Bridge and a line drawn to Normanby.
30 004 b,h
Objection E Bradley & G Langford & 46 others
Similar to Objection 30/003.
Suggested solution To move the Taranaki-King Country/Whanganui Electorate boundary to the Waingongoro River to specifically include Normanby.
30 005 b,h
Objection S Russell (See General 002 for details on this objectorβs overall strategy for electorate changes).
Objects to the inclusion of the Waingongoro, Okaiawa, Eltham and part of the Mangatoki-Moeroa statistical area units in the proposed Taranaki-King Country Electorate on the grounds of their community of interest with Hawera and the projected changes in population in Taranaki and neighbouring regions.
Suggested solution Transfer these statistical area units to the proposed Whanganui Electorate.
Objects to the inclusion of the Egmont Village, Urenui, and part of the Okoki-Okau statistical area units on the grounds of their community of interest with New Plymouth and projected changes in population in Taranaki and neighbouring regions.
Suggested solution Transfer these statistical area units to the proposed New Plymouth Electorate.
Next Page →
PDF embedding disabled (Crown copyright)
View this page online at:
VUW Te Waharoa —
NZ Gazette 1998, No 63
NZLII —
NZ Gazette 1998, No 63
β¨ LLM interpretation of page content
ποΈ Objection G C Turner & B R Cavey and 24 others
ποΈ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral objection, Taranaki-King Country Electorate, Whanganui Electoral District, Hawera
ποΈ Objection I Mauriri
ποΈ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral objection, Normanby, Whanganui Electorate, Hawera
- I Mauriri, Objected to Normanby residents not being included in the proposed Whanganui Electorate
ποΈ Objection J Murphy and 32 others
ποΈ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral objection, Normanby, Whanganui Electorate, Taranaki-King Country Electorate, Hawera
- J Murphy, Objected to the Normanby area not being included in the proposed Whanganui Electorate
ποΈ Objection E Bradley & G Langford & 46 others
ποΈ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral objection, Normanby, Whanganui Electorate, Taranaki-King Country Electorate, Waingongoro River
- E Bradley, Objected to the Normanby area not being included in the proposed Whanganui Electorate
- G Langford, Objected to the Normanby area not being included in the proposed Whanganui Electorate
ποΈ Objection S Russell
ποΈ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral objection, Waingongoro, Okaiawa, Eltham, Mangatoki-Moeroa, Taranaki-King Country Electorate, Whanganui Electorate, New Plymouth Electorate
- S Russell, Objected to the inclusion of certain areas in the proposed Taranaki-King Country Electorate