β¨ Electoral Boundary Objections
28 NOVEMBER NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE 3795
Suggested solution Place area unit 100 in Mt Herbert electorate.
[Note: Area unit 100 is bounded by Ferry Road, Hargood Street, Linwood Avenue, Humphreys Drive and the Heathcote River.]
Objection 740 A K MacFarlane
Similar to Objection 166 (53). Also requests that Westmorland and Hillmorton be placed in Mt Herbert.
Objection 738 M H Trieu
Similar to Objection 335.
Objection 733 Urban Technology Consultants
See Objection 719 (52) Addington for general reasons and suggested solution.
Objection 732 A McRobie
Objects to the proposed boundaries of the Addington and Mt Herbert electorates. These two proposed electorates are not the most appropriate configurations for the southern part of the Christchurch urban area because two substantial urban segments are separated by a third urban segment which forms part of another proposed electorate namely Addington.
Suggested solution It is possible to eliminate this separation and thus better meet compactness and community of interest criterion. Although substantial population numbers are involved a more appropriate division would be to include the area to the west of a line drawn from the junction of Candys Road and Halswell Road, generally south along Halswell Road and Tai Tapu Road to the proposed Mt Herbert/Rakaia boundary into Addington electorate. This would require Addington electorate to shed a similar population to Mt Herbert electorate. This could be achieved if Mt Herbert electorate was extended to include the suburbs of Sydenham, Somerfield, Beckenham and Waltham. The Christchurch City ward boundary between Wigram Ward on the west and Hagley and Heathcote Wards to the east be the north-western boundary of the proposed Mt Herbert electorate (ie Antigua, Strickland, Milton and Barrington Streets).
Objection 736 Woolston Community Association Inc.
Objects to the boundaries of the proposed Mt Herbert electorate on the grounds that Ferry Road is not an appropriate boundary as it cuts the Woolston Community in two.
Suggested solution Linwood Avenue would be a far more suitable boundary.
Objection 725 J Fountain
Objects to the inclusion of Hornby, Islington, Hei Hei and
Next Page →
PDF embedding disabled (Crown copyright)
View this page online at:
VUW Te Waharoa —
NZ Gazette 1994, No 126
NZLII —
NZ Gazette 1994, No 126
β¨ LLM interpretation of page content
ποΈ
Objection 739 Lyttelton Branch of the Alliance
(continued from previous page)
ποΈ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral Boundary, Objection, Boundary Adjustment, Ferrymead, Lyttelton
ποΈ Objection 740 A K MacFarlane
ποΈ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral Boundary, Objection, Westmorland, Hillmorton, Mt Herbert
- A. K. MacFarlane, Filed objection to electoral boundaries
ποΈ Objection 738 M H Trieu
ποΈ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral Boundary, Objection
- M. H. Trieu, Filed objection to electoral boundaries
ποΈ Objection 733 Urban Technology Consultants
ποΈ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral Boundary, Objection, Addington
ποΈ Objection 732 A McRobie
ποΈ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral Boundary, Objection, Addington, Mt Herbert, Christchurch
- A. McRobie, Filed objection to electoral boundaries
ποΈ Objection 736 Woolston Community Association Inc.
ποΈ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral Boundary, Objection, Mt Herbert, Ferry Road, Linwood Avenue
ποΈ Objection 725 J Fountain
ποΈ Governance & Central AdministrationElectoral Boundary, Objection, Hornby, Islington, Hei Hei
- J. Fountain, Filed objection to electoral boundaries