3202 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 111

McGoram, John Edward, Christian Community Church.
Moses, Donald John, Anglican.
Munn, Leonard Wallace David, Anglican.
Osborne, Ross, Elim Church of New Zealand.
Parkinson, Joseph, Roman Catholic.
Parsons, Alan, Christian Outreach Centre.
Payne, James Robert, Anglican.
Pratt, Watson, New Life Churches of New Zealand.
Rapsey, Bryan Edward, New Life Churches of New Zealand.
Robertson, Desmond Leonard James, City Lights.
Rose, Timothy Philip, Calvary Bible Church.
Sharda, Sunil Dutt, Auckland Satsang Ramayan Mandali Incorporated.
Stevenson, Suzanne Patricia, Salvation Army.
Stewart, Pauline Margaret, Presbyterian.
Te Hiini, Keith Dunlop, Church of God Te Haahi O Te Atua of New Zealand Incorporated.
Temo, Hina, Te Rongopai Assembly.
Thompson, Maurice Edmond, The Ark Fellowship.
Tietjens, Patrick Brian, Brethren.
Vaotuua, Lelia, Conference of Samoan Adventist Church.
Walker, Raana Grant, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
White, Brian Charles, Presbyterian.
Woolston, Peter James, New Life Churches of New Zealand.

Dated at Lower Hutt this 21st day of October 1994.

B. E. CLARKE, Registrar-General.

g07790

Labour

Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992

Notice of Intention to Apply for Ministerial Approval of a Code of Practice Under the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992—Power Operated Elevating Work Platforms

Pursuant to section 20 of the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992, I, Robert J. Hill, General Manager, Occupational Safety and Health Service of the Department of Labour, in exercise of those powers delegated to me by the Secretary of Labour, pursuant to section 41 of the State Sector Act 1988, hereby give notice of my intention, to apply to the Minister of Labour for his approval of a statement of preferred work practices or arrangements for health and safety in the design, use and maintenance of elevating work platforms, as an "Approved Code of Practice", under the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992.

These preferred work practices or arrangements are designed to describe safety and health precautions that should be taken in the design, use and maintenance of elevating work platforms. The elevating work platforms to which this approved code will apply are work platforms where the height of the platform may be adjusted by powered means using articulation, scissors mechanism, telescoping boom or tower, or any combination of these, and which are either vehicle mounted, self propelled, towed or manually moved.

Dated at Wellington this 18th day of October 1994.

Mr R. J. HILL, General Manager, Occupational Safety and Health Service of the Department of Labour.

g07730

Research, Science and Technology

Foundation for Research, Science and Technology Act 1990

Professor I Axford
Presiding Member
Foundation for Research, Science and Technology
PO Box 12 240
WELLINGTON

Dear Professor Axford

AMENDMENT TO THE 1992 “STATEMENT OF SCIENCE PRIORITIES”

Pursuant to section 7 of the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology Act 1990, I am now amending the “Statement of science priorities 1993/94 to 1997/98” which was issued by the Government in October 1992.

It is noted that much of the 1992 Priorities Statement has now been overtaken by events. Research strategies have been completed. Background material incorporated in the statement necessarily excludes recent developments leading to the Government’s increased commitment to science. Rather than extensively amending the Priority Statement to update all of this general material, the annexes to this letter incorporate only amendments which detail the new funding distribution for the PGSF and which impact directly on its management. Should this lead to inconsistency in the amended document, the amendments and additional notes detailed here are to guide interpretation.

This letter conveys the amendments desired by the Government in respect of:

• Allocation of funds (Annex I)
• Adherence to Thematic Priorities (Annex II)
• Access of the Tertiary Education Sector to the Public Good Science Fund (Annex III)
• Criteria for the Selection of Proposals (Annex IV)
• Transfer of funds to the new Basic Science Fund, and transitional arrangements. (Annex V)

This amendment will continue in force until the conclusion of the 1995/96 PGSF funding round. A completely new priority statement is to be issued in 1995 dealing with the period 1996/97 to 2000/01.

Yours sincerely