NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE

6 MAY

1171

the programme Crimewatch breached the responsibility placed on broadcasters to avoid the use of deceptive programme practices and that the action taken, having upheld a complaint that the item breached the requirement for truth and accuracy, was insufficient.

(xxvii) In decision 47/93, the authority declined to uphold the complaint from the Coalition of Concerned Citizens (NZ) of Otaki that the broadcast by Television New Zealand Limited of an item on Holmes on 2 November 1992 breached the responsibility placed on broadcasters to maintain standards of good taste and decency.

(xxviii) In decision 48/93, the authority declined to uphold the complaint from the Group Opposed to Advertising of Liquor of Hamilton that the broadcast by TV3 Network Services Limited of an advertisement for Steinlager beer on 11 November 1992 breached the responsibility placed on broadcasters that liquor advertisements shall not contain any description which is misleading about the product advertised, or suggest some special quality or property which cannot be sustained.

(xxxix) In decision 49/93, the authority declined to uphold the complaint from Together Ending Alcohol Misuse (TEAM) of Christchurch that the broadcast by TV3 Network Services Limited of an advertisement for Steinlager beer on 30 October 1992 breached the responsibility placed on broadcasters that liquor advertisements shall not contain any description which is misleading about the product advertised, or suggest some special quality or property which cannot be sustained.

(xl) In decision 50/93, the authority declined to uphold the complaint from the Christian Heritage Party of Christchurch that the broadcast by Television New Zealand Limited of an item on One Network News on 24 November 1992 breached the responsibility placed on broadcasters to be truthful and accurate on points of fact and to show balance, impartiality and fairness in dealing with controversial issues.

(xli) In decision 51/93, the authority upheld the complaint from Mr Geoff Powell of Auckland that the broadcast by Television New Zealand Limited of the film Casualties of War on 15 November 1992 breached the responsibility placed on broadcasters to maintain standards of good taste and decency.

(xlii) In decision 52/93, the authority declined to uphold the complaint from Mr Lisle Edwards of Levin that the broadcast by TV3 Network Services Ltd of a promo for the film Cocktail on 3 December 1992 breached the responsibility placed on broadcasters to maintain standards of good taste and decency.

(xliii) In decision 53/93, the authority declined to uphold the complaint from Mr Kerry Sharp of Palmerston North that the broadcast by TV3 Network Services Limited of an item entitled ‘Absolutely Positive’ on 60 Minutes on 13 December 1992 breached the responsibility placed on broadcasters to be truthful and accurate on points of fact and to show balance, impartiality and fairness in dealing with controversial issues.

Copies of decisions may be purchased from the Broadcasting Standards authority, P.O. Box 9213, Wellington, at the price of $5.00 each or by annual subscription of $100.00.

Dated at Wellington this 29th day of April 1993.

G. POWELL, Executive Director.

aw333

Transit New Zealand

Transit New Zealand Act 1989

Bylaw Fixing the Maximum Speed of Vehicles on Part of State Highway 1 at Huka Falls

Pursuant to sections 61 (2) of the Transit New Zealand Act 1989, and section 72 (1) (j) of the Transport Act 1962, Transit New Zealand makes the following bylaw.

Bylaw

1. This bylaw may be cited as Transit New Zealand Bylaw 1993/3.

2. This bylaw shall come into force immediately.

3. In this bylaw “motor vehicle” has the meaning assigned to it in section 2 (1) of the Transport Act 1962.

4. No person shall drive any motor vehicle at a speed exceeding 80 kilometres an hour on State Highway 1 from a point 500 metres north of the centreline of Huka Falls Loop Road at its southern junction with State Highway No. 1 (RP 606/5.93) in a generally southerly direction to a point 112 metres north of the centreline of Norman Smith Street (RP 606/7.31).

5. Every person who commits an offence against this bylaw is liable upon summary conviction to a fine not exceeding $500.

This bylaw is made by delegated authority from the Transit New Zealand Authority.

Dated at Wellington this 30th day of April 1993.

J. H. VAN BARNEVELD, Land Transport Manager, Transit New Zealand.

aw3556

Land Notices

Conservation

Conservation Act 1987

Corrigendum

Declaring Land to be Held for Conservation Purposes

In the notice dated 29 March 1993 and published in the New Zealand Gazette of 1 April 1993, No. 46 at page 867 in the Schedule for “All New Zealand Gazette, 1985, page 118” read “All New Zealand Gazette, 1985, page 138”.

(DOC File Cons. H.O. LAN 0088; C.O. 1.25.3.1)

iw3647

Declaring Land to be Held for Conservation Purposes

Pursuant to section 7 (1) of the Conservation Act 1987, the Minister of Conservation and the Minister of Lands, being the Minister responsible for the Department of State that has control of the land described in the Schedule hereto, jointly declare that the land is held for conservation purposes and it shall thereafter be so held.

Schedule

South Auckland Land District—Whakatane District

7.967 square metres, more or less, being Section 7, Block 1, Ahikereru Survey District. Part certificate of title Volume 86, folio 152. Survey Office Plan No. 28850.

Dated at Wellington this 20th day of April 1993.