✨ Income Tax Determination and Arts Council Boundary Change
NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE
No. 120
2592
| $ |
|---|
| 100,000 |
| 75,000 |
whence a = 25,000
The length of each Period is a year therefore b=1.
The principal outstanding is $100,000 in the first (one year) Period, and $70,000 in the subsequent Periods. Hence the Total Finance Charges are allocated as follows:
| Period | Length (years) | Principal outstanding (b×c) | Expenditure |
|---|---|---|---|
| b | c | a × b × c/d | |
| 1 | 1 | 100,000 | 8,065 |
| 2 | 1 | 70,000 | 5,645 |
| 3 | 1 | 70,000 | 5,645 |
| 4 | 1 | 70,000 | 5,645 |
Total d = 310,000
The expenditure incurred in each Period would be spread between income years using Determination G1A: Apportionment of Income and Expenditure on a Daily Basis
(Note that in practice the income in the final year would be determined using the base price adjustment.)
(7) Example G (discounted (Government) Stock)
A taxpayer buys New Zealand Government Stock on the secondary market. Details are as follows:
Face value $500,000
Coupon 16 per cent p.a. payable half yearly
Maturity 15 August 1994
Settlement 1 March 1992
Price $548,978 (YTM = 11.6% pa)
The taxpayer is not a cash basis holder but is eligible to use the straight line method to account for its financial arrangements, and decides to do so.
The Total Finance Charges are—
$500,000 maturity value
- 200,000 five coupons of $40,000
- 548,978 purchase price
whence a = 151,022
There is a broken first Period of 167 days followed by five half year Periods. A time unit of half years is appropriate.
Since the Periods are of unequal length, Method B applies.
The 167 days represents 167 × 2/365 = 0.9151 of a half year.
Therefore b = 0.9151 in the first Period and b = 1 in the remaining periods as there is one time unit of half a year in each Period.
The following table can be constructed:
| Half year | Principal outstanding | (b×c) | Expenditure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Period | c | e | a × b × c/d |
| 1 | 500,000 | 457,550(i) | 28,117(ii) |
| 2 | 500,000 | 500,000 | 30,726 |
| 3 | 500,000 | 500,000 | 30,726 |
| 4 | 500,000 | 500,000 | 30,726 |
| 5 | 500,000 | 500,000 | 30,727 |
Total d = 2,457,550
(i) e = b × c = 0.9151 × 500,000 = 457,550
(ii) a = 151,022 Total Finance Charges
b = 0.9151 Length of Period
c = 500,000 Principal outstanding
d = 2,457,550 sum of all items ‘e’ above
The income derived in each Period would be spread using Determination G1A: Apportionment of Income and Expenditure on a Daily Basis.
(8) Example H (transition to the straight line method)
This is similar to Example A, which is summarised as follows:
An amount of $9,250 (after fees and discount) is borrowed on 12 February 1991, repayable by 10 half yearly interest payments of $800 each, plus a final payment of $10,000.
The yield to maturity is 18.356 per cent.
Assume the borrower is a New Zealand taxpayer with a 31 March balance date and used the yield to maturity method for the first income year.
Then the expenditure deemed to be incurred in the income year ending 31 March 1991 is calculated as follows:
(a) Amount attributable to period 12 February–11 August 1991:
$9,250 × 18.356%/2 = $849
(b) Amount attributable to income year ending 31 March 1991:
$849 × 47 days/181 days = $220
Assume that in the 1991/1992 income year the taxpayer meets the criteria for the straight line method and decides to use Method A of this determination.
Then the amount of expenditure calculated in accordance with section 64C (2B) is as follows:
(a) From example A, the amount of expenditure that would have been deemed to be incurred under the straight line Method A up to 31 March 1992 is as follows:
(i) period 12 February–11 August 1991: $875
(ii) period 12 August–11 February 1992: $875
(iii) period 12 February–31 March 1992: $231
$875 × 48 days/182 days = 1,981
(b) Therefore, using the formula in section 64C (2B) (b)
a = 0 income derived using the straight line method
b = $1,981 expenditure incurred using the straight line method
c = 0 income derived in prior income years
d = $220 expenditure incurred in prior income years
(c) The amount calculated in accordance with the formula is—
a – b – c + d = 0 – 1,981 – 0 + 220 = –1,761
and since this is a negative amount, it is deemed to be expenditure incurred by the borrower.
This determination is signed by me on the 10th day of July 1991.
R. D. ADAIR, Deputy Commissioner of Inland Revenue.
907854
Internal Affairs
Queen Elizabeth the Second Arts Council of New Zealand Act 1974
Northbridge and Birkenhead Community Arts Councils—Boundary Change
Pursuant to section 32 (j) of the Queen Elizabeth II Arts Council of New Zealand Act 1974, on the recommendation of
Next Page →
PDF embedding disabled (Crown copyright)
View this page online at:
VUW Te Waharoa —
NZ Gazette 1991, No 120
NZLII —
NZ Gazette 1991, No 120
✨ LLM interpretation of page content
💰
Income Tax Determination G24: Straight Line Method
(continued from previous page)
💰 Finance & RevenueIncome Tax Act, Financial Arrangements, Straight Line Method, Total Finance Charges, Examples
- R. D. Adair, Deputy Commissioner of Inland Revenue
🎓 Queen Elizabeth the Second Arts Council of New Zealand Act 1974
🎓 Education, Culture & ScienceQueen Elizabeth II Arts Council, Boundary Change, Northbridge, Birkenhead