✨ Broadcasting and Road Classification Notices
12 AUGUST
THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE
2645
(c) The holder of this authorisation shall, unless exempted by the Tribunal, conform to and maintain the technical standards and rules as formulated by the Corporation in consultation with the Independent Broadcasters Association Inc. including the furnishing of such technical returns as may from time to time be required by these rules and standards.
(f) An audited statement of receipts and expenditure is to be forwarded to the Registrar within 1 month of the completion of broadcasting.
(g) Advertising will be permitted to a maximum of 4 minutes per hour and shall be directed to the university student audience. If required by the Tribunal a list of advertisers and amount paid for advertising shall be supplied within 1 month of the request therefor.
(h) The necessary licence to operate a broadcasting station is to be obtained from the Post Office.
(i) Programming material may also be directed to students of the Auckland Technical Institute.
Subject to the above, the station shall be operated in accordance with the application relating to the authorisation.
Dated the 23rd day of July 1982.
For the Tribunal:
B. H. SLANE, Chairman.
Decision No. 13/82
BRO. 28/82
Before the Broadcasting Tribunal
IN THE MATTER of the Broadcasting Act 1976, and IN THE MATTER of an application by HAURAKI ENTERPRISES LIMITED, to amend sound radio warrant MF43 (1XA):
B. H. Slane, Chairman; Lionel R. Scats, Member.
Hearing: Auckland, 26 July 1982.
Counsel: P. J. Dew for the Applicant.
ORAL DECISION
The 26th day of July 1982.
The applicant warrant holder had two conditions imposed on it at the time of the renewal of its warrant which were set out in Decision 11/80, they were—
(e) The warrant holder shall not substantially depart from the basic format and content of its programmes or the type or extent of services intended to be provided at the time of the grant of the warrant without the prior consent of the Broadcasting Tribunal and subject to any conditions which the Tribunal might impose in the public interest.
(f) Notwithstanding condition (e) the station may continue to provide the same services and basic format of its programmes as it was providing at the 30th day of June 1980, provided it lodges an application for such variations from its obligations as it considers necessary for the consideration of the Tribunal by 31 October 1980 and until the Tribunal has ruled on such application.
An appeal was subsequently lodged and was finally disposed of by judgment of the High Court on 11 March 1982. (M. No. 402/80.)
The applicant has now applied for the deletion of clause (f) and the substitution of a new clause:
"Notwithstanding condition (e) the station may continue to provide the same services and basic format of its programme as it was providing as at 11 June 1982."
This clause follows the pattern of an application in similar circumstances by Radio 1 Ltd. which was granted by the Tribunal in Decision 5/82. In that case the words "programmes" was used instead of "programme" and the word "warrant holder" rather than "station".
Mr Dew has indicated that he has no objection to his application being slightly amended in those two respects. There is some advantage in there being a consistency of wording.
The Tribunal has heard the evidence of the existing services and programmes provided by Hauraki Enterprises Ltd. in June this year (the time the application was made) and considers it desirable, indeed necessary, that the condition of the warrant be brought up to date. There is no opposition to the application and we do not think it is necessary for the Tribunal to discuss the matter in any detail.
The Tribunal, therefore, grants the application with the amendment of "station" to "warrant holder", and "programme" to "programmes" so that the clause will read—
Notwithstanding condition (e) the warrant holder may continue to provide the same services and basic format of its programmes as it was providing as at 11 June 1982.
For the Tribunal:
B. H. SLANE, Chairman.
The Road Classification (Waimea County) Notice No. 1, 1982
PURSUANT to regulation 3 of the Heavy Motor Vehicle Regulations 1974*, the Secretary for Transport hereby gives the following notice:
NOTICE
-
This notice may be cited as the Road Classification (Waimea County) Notice No. 1, 1982.
-
The Waimea County Council’s proposed classification of the roads as set out in the Schedule hereto is hereby approved.
-
The notices dated the 13th day of August 1958†, the 6th day of July 1970‡, the 6th day of October 1972§ and the 21st day of December 1972¶ which relate to the classification of the roads described in the Schedule hereto are hereby revoked.
SCHEDULE
WAIMEA COUNTY
Roads Classified in Class One
All roads within Murchison Township.
Aranui Road.
Bartletts Road.
Gowan Valley Road.
Harleys Road: from Moutere Highway to Harakeke Mill.
Lansdowne Road: from Queen Street to No. 60, State Highway (Richmond - Collingwood).
Lower Queen Street.
Moutere Highway.
Nayland Road.
Ranzau West Road.
Redwoods Road.
Saxtons West Road.
Tapawera-Glenhope Road: from No. 61, State Highway (Motueka-Motupiko) to the New Zealand Forest Service Complex.
Wai-iti Valley Road.
Roads Classified in Class Two
All roads under the control of the Waimea County Council not otherwise named in this Schedule.
Dated at Wellington this 2nd day of August 1982.
A. J. HEALY, Secretary for Transport.
*S.R. 1974/218
Amendment No. 1: S.R. 1974/309
†New Zealand Gazette, No. 52 dated 21 August 1958, p. 1111
‡New Zealand Gazette, No. 42 dated 16 July 1970, p. 1248
§New Zealand Gazette, No. 89 dated 31 October 1972, p. 2356
¶New Zealand Gazette, No. 1 dated 11 January 1973, p. 39
(M.O.T. 28/8/Waimea County)
The Road Classification (Masterton County)
Notice No. 1, 1982
PURSUANT to regulation 3 of the Heavy Motor Vehicle Regulations 1974*, the Secretary for Transport hereby gives the following notice:
NOTICE
-
This notice may be cited as the Road Classification (Masterton County) Notice No. 1, 1982.
-
The Masterton County Council’s proposed classification of the roads as set out in the Schedule hereto is hereby approved.
-
The two notices dated the 27th day of October 1950† and the notice dated the 20th day of October 1950‡, which relate to the classification of the roads described in the Schedule hereto, are hereby revoked.
Next Page →
PDF embedding disabled (Crown copyright)
View this page online at:
VUW Te Waharoa —
NZ Gazette 1982, No 94
NZLII —
NZ Gazette 1982, No 94
✨ LLM interpretation of page content
🎓
Broadcasting Tribunal Decision on Auckland University Students’ Association FM Broadcasting Application
(continued from previous page)
🎓 Education, Culture & Science23 July 1982
Broadcasting, Tribunal decision, Auckland University, FM broadcasting, Student radio, Broadcasting Act 1976
- B. H. SLANE, Chairman
🎓 Broadcasting Tribunal Decision on Hauraki Enterprises Limited's Application to Amend Sound Radio Warrant MF43 (1XA)
🎓 Education, Culture & Science26 July 1982
Broadcasting, Tribunal decision, Hauraki Enterprises, Radio warrant, Broadcasting Act 1976
- B. H. Slane, Chairman
- Lionel R. Scats, Member
- P. J. Dew, Counsel
🚂 Road Classification Notice for Waimea County
🚂 Transport & Communications2 August 1982
Road classification, Waimea County, Heavy Motor Vehicle Regulations 1974
- A. J. HEALY, Secretary for Transport
🚂 Road Classification Notice for Masterton County
🚂 Transport & Communications2 August 1982
Road classification, Masterton County, Heavy Motor Vehicle Regulations 1974
- A. J. HEALY, Secretary for Transport