4 AUGUST
THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE
1241

Classification of Roads in Waikato County

PURSUANT to regulation 3 of the Heavy Motor Vehicle Regulations 1955*, the Commissioner of Transport hereby revokes so much of the Warrant dated the 1st day of June 1950†, as relates to the classification of road in Waikato County described in the Schedule hereto and hereby approves the County Council’s proposed classification of the said road as set out in the said Schedule.

SCHEDULE
WAIKATO COUNTY
Road Classified in Class Two
CAMBRIDGE-Eureka road (from the Cambridge Borough Boundary to the Pencarrow-Hautapu road and Hautapu - Te Miro road).

Dated at Wellington this 26th day of July 1966.
R. J. POLASCHEK, Commissioner of Transport.

*S.R. 1955/59 (Reprinted with Amendments Nos. 1 to 4: S.R. 1961/159)
Amendment No. 5: S.R. 1963/70
Amendment No. 6: S.R. 1963/199
Amendment No. 7: S.R. 1965/142
Amendment No. 8: S.R. 1965/198

†Gazette No. 36, 1 June 1950, Vol. II, p. 734
(TT. 8/8/254)

Varying Notice of Declaration of State Highways

PURSUANT to section 11 of the National Roads Act 1953, the National Roads Board, acting with the written approval of the Minister of Works, hereby gives notice that it varies the notice declaring public highways to be State highways, dated 9 March 1960, published in Gazette, 24 March 1960, Vol. I, page 384, by deleting from the Schedule to the said notice the paragraph described in the First Schedule hereto, and substituting therefor the paragraph set out in the Second Schedule hereto.

FIRST SCHEDULE
Paragraph deleted from the South Island section of Part II of the Schedule to the said notice:
“Picton—
No. 1 State Highway. From the intersection of London Quay and High Street, along High Street and Wairau Street to the southern boundary of Picton.”

SECOND SCHEDULE
Paragraph substituted in the South Island section of Part II of the Schedule to the said notice:
“Picton—
From the intersection, London Quay and Auckland Street, along Auckland Street and Wairau Road to the southern boundary of Picton.”

Dated at Wellington this 28th day of July 1966.
Signed on behalf of the National Roads Board:
B. C. MAGILL, Member.
J. H. MACKY, Member.

Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1954—Proposed Cancellation of Registration of Industrial Union

PURSUANT to section 85 of the Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1954, it is hereby notified that the registration of the Southland Labourers’ and Related Trades Industrial Union of Workers, Registered No. 1492, situated at Trades Hall, Esk Street, Invercargill, will, unless cause to the contrary is shown, be cancelled on the expiration of six weeks from the date of the publication of this notice in the Gazette.

Dated at Wellington this 26th day of July 1966.
H. G. DUNCAN,
Registrar of Industrial Unions,
Department of Labour.

Law Practitioners Act 1955

PURSUANT to the Law Practitioners Act 1955, notice is hereby given that the Disciplinary Committee of the New Zealand Law Society on 21 July 1966 ordered that the name of David McClelland Dickson be restored to the Rolls of Barristers and of Solicitors of the Supreme Court of New Zealand.

Dated at Wellington this 28th day of July 1966.
G. J. GRACE, Registrar of the Supreme Court.

Tariff and Development Board Notice No. 47—Public Inquiry into Import Duties and Import Licensing Affecting Certain Types of Bonded Fibre Fabrics Used as Substitutes for Leather (e.g., “Corfam”)

1. The Tariff and Development Board proposes to inquire into and report on the question of whether a determination under the terms of Tariff item 655.410.1 should be made in respect of bonded fibre fabrics with a blown plastic coating (e.g., “Corfam”) and, if so, what rates of duty should be imposed on these goods. The goods in question are covered by the following Tariff provisions:

Rates of Duty
British General Preferential Tariff

Bonded fibre fabrics, whether or not impregnated or coated:
655.410.1 As may be determined by the Minister . . . . . Such rate of duty not exceeding 25% 25% as the Minister may in any case direct
655.410.2 Other . . . . . Free Free

“Corfam” and similar materials are at present entitled to be entered free of duty under Tariff item 655.410.2.

2. The inquiry will also include import licensing as affecting the goods.

3. For the purpose of taking evidence on this subject the Board will hold a public inquiry commencing on Tuesday, 18 October 1966, at 10.30 a.m., in the Board Room, First Floor, New Zealand Law Society Building, 26 Waring Taylor Street, Wellington.

4. Any person who intends to tender evidence should comply with the “Notes for Guidance of Witnesses”, which have been prepared by the Board. A copy of these notes may be obtained from the undernamed.

5. Twelve copies of a typewritten statement of the evidence to be tendered, compiled in accordance with these notes, should be lodged with the undernamed not later than Tuesday, 4 October 1966. Each statement will need to be presented under oath at the public inquiry by the person tendering it.

Dated at Wellington this 1st day of August 1966.
P. A. T. ABRAHAM,
Acting Secretary, Tariff and Development Board
P.O. Box 5070, Wellington.

Order No. 2 (1966) of the Trade Practices and Prices Commission

In the matter of the Trade Practices Act 1958, and in the matter of a report by the Examiner of Trade Practices and Prices into the terms on which the East Coast Farmers’ Fertilizer Co. Ltd. has agreed to sell phosphatic fertilizer to the Hawke’s Bay Trading Society Ltd., the Economic Trading Association (Wairarapa) Ltd., and the Gisborne, East Coast Trading Society Ltd.

WHEREAS the Trade Practices and Prices Commission has received from the Examiner of Trade Practices and Prices (hereinafter referred to as “the Examiner”) a report, pursuant to section 17 of the said Act, in which it was alleged that the East Coast Farmers’ Fertilizer Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the company”) refused to accept orders from the Hawke’s Bay Trading Society Ltd., the Economic Trading Association (Wairarapa) Ltd., and the Gisborne, East Coast Trading Society Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the societies”) under the terms applicable to incorporated farmers’ organisations, as defined in clause 4 (1) (e) of the price order relating to phosphatic fertilizers (hereinafter referred to as “the price order”);

And whereas the said Examiner’s report alleged that this refusal was a trade practice, in terms of section 19 (2) (i) of the said Act, which was contrary to the public interest in terms of section 20 (1) (a) and (d) of the said Act;

And whereas in the said report of the Examiner he stated that he had conducted conciliation proceedings with the company under the provisions of section 16A of the said Act, and that the company, while denying the Examiner’s allegations that its action was a trade practice which was contrary to the public interest, nevertheless had agreed to accept orders from the societies under the terms specified in the said price order on specific terms to obviate the risk of financial loss to the company in trading with the societies, and that the said societies had agreed to the specific terms as to payment for the supplies;

And whereas the Examiner has recommended that the Commission should make an order under section 19 of the said Act to direct the company to discontinue the practice of refusing to accept orders from the societies, provided the