27 MAR.]

THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE

Price Order No. 1364 (Amendment No. 1 of Price Order No. 1354) (Nails)

Pursuant to the Control of Prices Act 1947, the Price Tribunal, acting with the authority of the Minister of Industries and Commerce,
hereby makes the following amending Price Order:

1. This Order may be cited as Price Order No. 1364 and shall be read together with and deemed part of Price Order No. 1354* (hereinafter
   referred to as the principal Order).

2. This Order shall come into force on the 27th day of March 1952.

3. The principal Order is hereby amended by revoking the Schedule thereto and substituting the following Schedule:

SCHEDULE

Dated at Wellington, this 27th day of March 1952.

The Seal of the Price Tribunal was affixed hereto in the presence of—

[L.S.]

D. W. A. BARKER, Presiding Member.
I. D. REID, Member.

• Gazette, 13 March 1952, Vol. I, page 386.

Price Order No. 1366 (Amendment No. 2 of Price Order No. 962)
(Spirits and Beer)

Pursuant to the Control of Prices Act 1947, the Price Tribunal,
acting with the authority of the Minister of Industries and
Commerce, hereby makes the following amending Price Order:

1. This Order may be cited as Price Order No. 1366 and shall
   be read together with and deemed part of Price Order No. 962*
   (hereinafter referred to as the principal Order).

2. This Order shall come into force on the 27th day of March

4. The principal Order is hereby amended as follows:

(a) By omitting from subclause (2) of clause 5 the words “sold
for consumption” and the word “sold” where it appears
after the word “drink” and substituting in each case
the word “served”.

(b) By omitting from subclause (3) of clause 5 the word “sold”
wherever it appears and substituting in each case the
word “served”.

(c) By omitting from subclause (2) of clause 6 the words “sold
for consumption” and substituting the word “served”.

(d) By inserting after clause 9 the following clause:

“9A. For the purposes of this Order liquor shall be
deemed to be served in a lounge or a dining-room only
if it is served to the purchaser by the licensee or his
servant in the lounge or dining-room and not directly
to the purchaser over a counter.”

Dated at Wellington, this 27th day of March 1952.

The Seal of the Price Tribunal was affixed hereto in the presence
of—

[L.S.]

P. B. MARSHALL, President.
D. W. A. BARKER, Member.

• Gazette, 13 January 1949, Vol. I, page 15.

Commission to Inquire Into and Report on the Circumstances of the
Prosecution of Daniella Sylvia Joan Weir

FREYBERG, Governor-General

To all to whom these presents shall come, and to HENRY WILFRED
BUNDLE, Esquire, of Nelson, Retired Magistrate: GREETING:

Whereas it has been deemed expedient that a Commission
shall issue to inquire into the circumstances of the prosecution
of Daniella Sylvia Joan Weir on a charge of making a false
statement under section 123 of the Post and Telegraph Act 1928:

Now, therefore, I, Bernard Cyril, Baron Freyberg, the Governor-General of New Zealand, in pursuance and exercise of the powers
conferred upon me by the Commissions of Inquiry Act 1908, and all
other powers and authorities enabling me in this behalf, and acting
by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, do
hereby nominate, constitute, and appoint you, the said HENRY
WILFRED BUNDLE, to be a Commission to inquire into and report
upon the following matters—

1. The manner in which the police officers handled the investigation of the facts before bringing a charge under paragraph (b)
   of subsection (1) of section 123 of the Post and Telegraph Act 1928,
   against Daniella Sylvia Joan Weir that she fraudulently stated that
   she had posted a postal packet containing the sum of £5 whereas in
   fact she did not so post it.

2. The circumstances in which and the conditions under which
   the said Daniella Sylvia Joan Weir was interviewed and interrogated
   by any police officer or officers.

3. The circumstances in which the said Daniella Sylvia Joan
   Weir came to make a written statement that she had not posted the
   letter, and whether her statement was made freely and voluntarily.

4. The extent to which at the taking of the statement the rules
   relating to the taking of statements by the police were adhered to
   or departed from.

5. Whether the method of interrogation of the said Daniella
   Sylvia Joan Weir was open to question or was in any way improper.

6. Whether the said Daniella Sylvia Joan Weir was or should
   have been cautioned that she was not obliged to make a statement
   but that if she did it could be used in evidence.

7. The extent of any further investigation carried out by police
   officers to verify the statement.

8. The nature and extent of any inquiries made by police officers
   after the recovery of the letter.

9. The procedure adopted by police officers in relation to the
   re-hearing of the charge.

And generally to inquire into and report upon such other
matters arising out of the premises as may come to your notice in the
course of your inquiries which you consider should be investigated
and upon any matters affecting the premises which you consider
should be brought to the attention of the Government:

And you are hereby authorized to make and conduct any
inquiry under these presents at such times and places as you deem
expedient, with power to adjourn from time to time and place to
place as you think fit, and to call before you and to examine on oath
or otherwise such persons as you think capable of affording you
information as to the matters aforesaid, and to call for and examine
all such books, papers, writings, documents, and reports as you
deem likely to afford you the fullest information on any such matters:

And using all diligence, you are required to report to me in
writing under your hand not later than the 30th day of June 1952,
your finding and opinion on the matters aforesaid together with such
recommendations as you think fit to make in respect thereof: