MAY 15.] THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. 1655

Number 15453 and that portion of Rural Section 5267 situated to the south of a line in continuation westerly of the northern boundary of said Rural Section 15453.

Dated at Christchurch this third day of May, one thousand nine hundred and thirteen.

H. W. BISHOP,
Stipendiary Magistrate.

380

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND,
NORTHERN DISTRICT.

No. 628.—In Divorce.

Between ANNA NOON, Petitioner, and FREDERICK WILLIAM NOON, Respondent.

To FREDERICK WILLIAM NOON, of Wellington, in the Provincial District of Wellington, in New Zealand, Hotel-keeper.

WHEREAS ANNA NOON, of Auckland, claiming to have been lawfully married on the 22nd day of April, 1902, at Wallsend, Brunnerton, in the Provincial District of Westland, in New Zealand, by the Reverend D. P. Carew, to you the said Frederick William Noon, has filed her petition against you praying for a dissolution of her said marriage and for the custody of the child of the said marriage, to wit, Phyllis Ann Elizabeth Noon, born 20th February, 1903, wherein she alleges that you the said Frederick William Noon in or about the month of May, 1904, wilfully deserted her without just cause and left her so deserted during five years and upwards: And whereas by order of this Honourable Court dated the 23rd day of April, 1913, it was decreed that this abstract should be advertised in the New Zealand Gazette:

Now, take notice that unless within thirty days after the publication hereof you do file in this Honourable Court at Auckland an answer to the said petition, the said Court will after the expiration of thirty days after the publication hereof, at the Supreme Court House at the City of Auckland, proceed to hear the said charge proved and to pronounce sentence therein your absence notwithstanding. And further take notice that before filing the said answer you must enter an appearance in person or by your solicitor at the Registry of the said Court at the City of Auckland aforesaid, and that if you do not enter such an appearance you will not be allowed to address the Court either in person or by counsel at any stage of the proceedings.

Sealed at Auckland the 8th day of May, 1913.

E. W. CAVE,
Deputy Registrar.

The abstract was extracted by Richard Arnold Singer, Solicitor for the Petitioner. The Petitioner’s address for service is at the office of the said Richard Arnold Singer, 187 Queen Street, Auckland.

A copy of the said petition may be inspected at the Supreme Court Offices or at the office of the said Richard Arnold Singer.

381

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND,
NORTHERN DISTRICT.

(In Divorce.)

Between JEMIMA ADA LLOYD, of Auckland, in the Provincial District of Auckland, in New Zealand, Petitioner, and JOHN HORATIO LLOYD, of Christchurch, in the Provincial District of Canterbury, in New Zealand, Agent, Respondent.

George the Fifth, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland King, Defender of the Faith.

To JOHN HORATIO LLOYD, of Christchurch, Agent.

WHEREAS JEMIMA ADA LLOYD, of Auckland, claiming to have been lawfully married to you, has filed her petition against you in our said Court praying for a dissolution of her marriage with you, wherein she alleges that you have been guilty of desertion, habitual drunkenness, and cruelty, and failure to support the Petitioner and her child: Take notice that unless within twenty-eight days after service hereof on you exclusive of the day of such service you file in our said Court at Auckland an answer to the said petition, a copy of which sealed with the seal of our said Court is served on you herewith, the said Court will proceed to hear the said charge proved and to pronounce sentence therein notwithstanding your absence. And further take notice that before filing the said answer you must enter an appearance in person or by your solicitor at the Registry of the said Court at Auckland aforesaid, and that if you do not enter such an appearance you will not be allowed to address the Court either in person or by counsel at any stage of the proceedings.

Sealed at Auckland the 31st day of August, 1912.

[l.s.] E. W. CAVE,
Deputy Registrar.

This citation was extracted by Richard Arnold Singer, Solicitor for the Petitioner. The Petitioner’s address for service is at the office of Richard Arnold Singer, 187 Queen Street, Auckland.

382

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND,
NORTHERN DISTRICT.

(In Divorce.)

Between JEMIMA ADA LLOYD, of Auckland, in the Provincial District of Auckland, in New Zealand, Petitioner, and JOHN HORATIO LLOYD, of Christchurch, in the Provincial District of Canterbury, in New Zealand, Agent, Respondent.

The 31st day of August, 1912.

THE petition of JEMIMA ADA LLOYD, of Auckland, in the Provincial District of Auckland, in New Zealand, showeth as follows:—

1. The Petitioner, then Jemima Ada Cowley, a spinster, was on the 21st day of October, 1901, lawfully married to John Horatio Lloyd at the office of the Registrar of Marriages at Auckland aforesaid by E. H. Lyons, the Registrar.

2. After her said marriage the Petitioner lived and cohabited with her husband at Auckland aforesaid, and the Petitioner and her said husband have had issue of their marriage one child, to wit, Phyllis Muriel Florence Adzie Lloyd, born 25th day of October, 1903.

3. In or about the month of June, 1907, the said John Horatio Lloyd wilfully deserted the Petitioner without just cause, and for five years and upwards—namely, from that date down to the present time—has continued to desert the Petitioner without just cause.

4. The said John Horatio Lloyd during the last four years and upwards—namely, since the year 1903—has been an habitual drunkard and has habitually left the Petitioner and her said child without means of support.

5. The said John Horatio Lloyd has been habitually guilty of cruelty towards the Petitioner by using abusive, offensive, and threatening language to her.

6. The Petitioner was born in the Provincial District of Auckland aforesaid, and is now domiciled in New Zealand and resides at Auckland aforesaid.

7. The Petitioner’s said husband was born in England, and is now domiciled in New Zealand, and resides at Christchurch, in the Provincial District of Canterbury.

8. The Petitioner prays—
   (a.) That the said marriage of the Petitioner with her said husband be dissolved;
   (b.) That the Petitioner have the custody of the child of the said marriage;
   (c.) That the Petitioner have such further or other relief in the premises as may be just.

[l.s.] J. ADA LLOYD,
Petitioner.

Witness—J. H. Reyburn, Solicitor, Auckland.

383

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CARRY ON BUSINESS.

NOTICE is hereby given that the Midland and Textile Insurance Company (Limited) proposes to commence business in New Zealand, and that legal process of any kind may be served upon it and notices of any kind may be addressed or delivered at the office of the company situated at No. 115 Lower Rattray Street, Dunedin.

Dated this 8th day of May, 1913.

KIRKCALDY AND CO.,
Attorney in New Zealand for the Midland and Textile Insurance Company (Limited).

384

DANNEVIRKE COUNTY COUNCIL.

THE MOTOR REGULATION ACT, 1908.

NOTICE is hereby given that at a meeting of the Dannevirke County Council held on the 7th day of May, 1913, it was resolved that Part II of the Motor Regulation Act, 1908, be brought into operation in the County of Dannevirke on and after the 2nd day of June, 1913.

Dannevirke, 9th May, 1913.

R. BAKER,
Clerk, Dannevirke County Council.

385