Patent Notices




1302
THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE.
[No. 43

No. 16217.—4th May, 1903.—JOSEPH FOORD WILSON, of Spey Street, Invercargill, New Zealand, Dentist, and EDWARD HENRY WHITMORE, of The Crescent, Invercargill aforesaid, Printer. An improved spring-hook for securing luggage-labels and for supporting show-cards and the like purposes.

Claims.—(1.) For the purpose indicated, a hook of flat spring metal, substantially as described and illustrated. (2.) For the purpose indicated, a spring-hook made of flat metal, and having an integrally formed tongue projecting towards the shank of said hook, substantially as described and illustrated.
(Specification, 1s. 6d.; drawing, 1s.)

No. 16279.—29th April, 1903.—CHARLES WHITTINGHAM WYCHERLEY and HENRY SPARROW WYCHERLEY, of Wellington and Palmerston North, New Zealand, Saddlers. An improvement in fastening of leggings.*

Claims.—(1.) A fastening for the purpose indicated consisting of a strap divided at one end into a plurality of parts or ends, each independently secured to one side of the legging, and a buckle upon the other side of the legging, adapted to receive the single end of said strap, substantially as described and illustrated. (2.) A fastening for the purpose indicated consisting of the parts arranged, combined, and operating substantially as specified and as illustrated in the various figures of the drawing.
(Specification, 2s. 6d.; drawing, 1s.)

No. 16298.—4th May, 1903.—ARTHUR BISHOP, of Carterton, New Zealand, Bush-manager. An improved snatch-block.

Claims.—(1.) In snatch-blocks, a spindle upon which the pulley is loosely mounted, hinged at one end to the bottom end of one of the side frames, and rigidly secured at the other end to the other side frame, in combination with means whereby the two side frames may be locked together at their top ends and be freed from each other, substantially as and for the purposes set forth. (2.) In snatch-blocks, a pair of side frames placed one on each side of the block-pulley, a spindle passing loosely through the pulley hinged at one end to one of the side frames, and rigidly secured at its other end to the other side frame, a cross-bar firmly secured at one end to the top end of the hinged side frame, while its other end is formed with a projection adapted to be passed through a hole in the other side frame, and a removable locking-pin passing through the projection so as to lock the two side frames together, as specified. (3.) The general arrangement, construction, and combination of parts in my improved snatch-block as described and explained, as illustrated in the drawing, and for the several purposes set forth.
(Specification, 3s. 6d.; drawing, 1s.)

No. 16299.—6th May, 1903.—PETER BURD JAGGER, of 5, Warrington Gardens, Maida Vale, London, England. Improvements in non-refillable bottles and like vessels.

Claims.—(1.) The improved bottle or vessel for containing liquid, and the means for preventing the same, when once emptied, from being refilled in fraud of the original packer, substantially as described and shown. (2.) The improved non-refillable bottle or vessel a for containing liquid, a seating b formed in the neck or shoulder of the said vessel, with a ball-valve c adapted to fit on to the said seating b, and surmounted by a coned stopper f having a concave base resting upon the ball-stopper c, a frame or cage surmounting the said coned stopper f, the base ring h of which rests upon an annular ridge d formed in the neck of the vessel a, the said base ring being formed integrally or otherwise with two or more uprights k k connected to a crown ring l and a central table or partition m, the said crown ring being adapted for expansion radially to fit into an annular groove e formed in the neck of the vessel a, the said frame or cage, when in position, being surmounted by a cork or stopper p, substantially as and for the purposes set forth, and shown by the drawings. (3.) The improved non-refillable bottle or vessel a for containing liquids, a seating b formed in the neck or shoulder of said vessel, a ball-valve c adapted to fit on to the said seating b, and surmounted by a coned stopper f having a concave base resting upon the ball-stopper c, a frame or cage surmounting the said stopper f, the base ring h whereof rests upon an annular ridge d formed in the neck of the vessel a, the said base ring being formed integrally or otherwise with uprights k k connected to a crown ring l and a central table or partition m, the said crown ring being adapted for expansion radially to fit into an annular groove t formed in the neck of the vessel a, the said frame or cage, when in position, being surmounted by a cork or stopper p, substantially as and for the purposes described, and shown by the drawings, more particularly by Figs. 10 and 11. (4.) In a non-refillable bottle or like vessel a having any form of valve or stopper for closing the neck of said vessel, the combination therewith of a metallic cage or frame the upper end or crown ring of which is adapted for expansion radially to fit into an annular groove formed in the neck of said vessel, substantially as described and shown. (5.) In a non-refillable prepared bottle or vessel such as a, the combination therewith of a ball-valve c, coned stopper f, and metallic frame such as h, k, l, m, substantially as set forth and shown.
(Specification, 14s.; drawings, 3s.)

No. 16300.—6th May, 1903.—EDWARD HALL MILLER, of 81, Chardmore Road, Clapton Common, London, England, Fellow of the Chemical Society. A process for the elimination of sulphur from sulphide-ores.

Claims.—(1.) The described process for the elimination of sulphur from sulphide-ores, consisting in mixing powdered ore with powdered carbon or carbonaceous material and with sodium-sulphide or other suitable sulphide, exposing the mixture to a low heat in a restricted current of air for a short time, exposing the still heated product freely to air to cause rapid oxidation to ensue, and mixing the resultant product with a nitrate, such as Chili saltpetre, and heating the mixture. (2.) The process of completing the elimination of sulphur from sulphide-ores, consisting in heating the ore from which most of the sulphur has been eliminated with Chili saltpetre or other suitable nitrate, as described.
(Specification, 4s. 3d.)

No. 16302.—6th May, 1903.—THOMAS JOHNSTON GRIER, of Lead, in the County of Lawrence, South Dakota, United States of America, Superintendent of Homestake Mining Company. Improvements in processes for recovering precious metals from ores.

Claims.—(1.) The process of extracting precious metals from slimes, consisting in subjecting slimes to the action of a cyanide solution whereby the watery portions of the slimes may be replaced by the cyanide solution, the latter being of greater density than the water of the slimes, then treating the charge with compressed air and afterwards replacing the cyanide solution with a salt solution of greater density than the cyanide solution, as set forth. (2.) The process of extracting precious metals from slimes, consisting in subjecting the slimes to the action of a cyanide solution under pressure, whereby the water portions of the slimes may be replaced by the cyanide solution, the latter being of greater density than the water of the slimes, then treating the charge with compressed air and afterwards replacing the cyanide solution by introducing a salt solution under pressure and of greater density than the cyanide solution, as set forth. (3.) The process of extracting precious metals from slimes, consisting in spraying the thick slimes with a protective solution to neutralise the acids therein, of introducing a cyanide-of-potassium solution in the slimes to replace the watery portions thereof, the latter being of less density than the cyanide solution, afterwards treating the charge with air under pressure and then introducing in the vat containing the solution a salt solution under pressure, as set forth. (4.) The process of extracting precious metals from slimes, consisting in subjecting the slimes to a protective solution to neutralise the acid therein, then introducing a cyanide-potassium solution into the slimes to replace the watery portion thereof, the latter being of less density than the cyanide solution, of treating the charge with compressed air and afterward introducing in the vat in which the slime is contained a salt solution, and heating the contents of the vat above its false bottom for the purpose of reducing the density of the upper stratum of liquid, as set forth. (5.) The process of extracting precious metals from slimes, consisting in directing the slimes into a settling-tank, drawing off the thicker portions of the slimes and depositing the same into a leaching-vat, of introducing a cyanide solution under pressure through perforations in the false bottom of the vat, causing the watery portions of the slimes to be replaced by said cyanide solution, then treating the charge with air under pressure and afterward introducing in the vat a salt solution of greater density than the cyanide solution, as set forth.
(Specification, 6s.; drawing, 1s.)



Next Page →



Online Sources for this page:

VUW Te Waharoa PDF NZ Gazette 1903, No 43





✨ LLM interpretation of page content

🌾 Patent No. 16217: Improved Spring-Hook for Luggage Labels

🌾 Primary Industries & Resources
4 May 1903
Patents, Spring-hook, Luggage Labels, Show-cards, Invercargill
  • Joseph Foord Wilson, Co-inventor of spring-hook
  • Edward Henry Whitmore, Co-inventor of spring-hook

🌾 Patent No. 16279: Improvement in Fastening of Leggings

🌾 Primary Industries & Resources
29 April 1903
Patents, Legging Fastening, Strap and Buckle Design, Saddlery, Wellington, Palmerston North
  • Charles Whittingham Wycherley, Co-inventor of legging fastening
  • Henry Sparrow Wycherley, Co-inventor of legging fastening

🌾 Patent No. 16298: Improved Snatch-Block

🌾 Primary Industries & Resources
4 May 1903
Patents, Snatch-block, Pulley Mechanism, Bush Equipment, Carterton
  • Arthur Bishop, Inventor of improved snatch-block

🌾 Patent No. 16299: Improvements in Non-Refillable Bottles

🌾 Primary Industries & Resources
6 May 1903
Patents, Non-refillable Bottles, Liquid Containers, Valve Design, London, England
  • Peter Burd Jagger, Inventor of non-refillable bottle

🌾 Patent No. 16300: Process for Elimination of Sulphur from Sulphide-Ores

🌾 Primary Industries & Resources
6 May 1903
Patents, Sulphur Removal, Sulphide Ores, Chemical Process, London, England
  • Edward Hall Miller (Fellow of the Chemical Society), Inventor of sulphur elimination process

🌾 Patent No. 16302: Improvements in Processes for Recovering Precious Metals from Ores

🌾 Primary Industries & Resources
6 May 1903
Patents, Precious Metal Extraction, Cyanide Process, Slimes Treatment, South Dakota, USA
  • Thomas Johnston Grier (Superintendent of Homestake Mining Company), Inventor of precious metal recovery process