✨ Despatch regarding New Zealand Company settlements
3
in these Laws. The Local Government
should be ready to render the Trustees
any assistance (not involving expense to
the community) which is really desired
by them: but it is far better that the
responsibility for the management of
this Fund should be towards the Land
Purchasers themselves, who are the
parties interested. You will observe
that the power to make laws for this
purpose is given to the General Legisla-
ture, but with power to delegate it to
that of the Province. In the uncertainty
which prevails, and must for the present
prevail, as to the ultimate form and
powers of the Provincial Legislatures, I
have thought that this provision will best
meet all the circumstances of the case.
-
On the subject of the expense of
administering these settlements, I have
nothing to add to the discretion given in
my despatch of March 19th, circum-
stances remaining the same. So long
as the receipt of Land Revenue in these
Settlements continues to be quite insig-
nificant, I hope that the special expense
which they may occasion is also very
trifling, while if any circumstances should
revive the demand, the Land Fund, es-
pecially with the power which you will
now possess to vary the Terms, and ap-
propriate larger sums to management (if
more management is required) will meet
the exigencies of the case. -
Section 10 of the Act is intended
to meet a difficulty which is thought to
have arisen, and to which I referred in
the concluding paragraph of my despatch
No. 47 of 31st May last; as to the deci-
sion on conflicting claims on the New
Zealand Company\'s Land Orders, through
the Company\'s notice of surrender: and
its provision, which is of a strictly legal
character, will be easily apprehended by
your law advisers. -
By the printed correspondence
which accompanies this despatch, you
will learn that the Act as now passed
contains only part of the provisions
originally intended. Those which have
been omitted formed a plan for changing
the present liability of the Land Fund
for £268,370 to the New Zealand Com-
pany into a liability to the extent of
£200,000 only, but charged in the form
of debentures both on the general and
land revenue of the Colony; with powers
to holders of those Debentures to com-
mute them for remission orders available
at sales of the demesne lands. -
This was an arrangement which I
considered could only be properly adopted
with the general concurrence of all parties
whose interest it would have affected, so
far as this could be ascertained without
the great delay of communicating with
yourself. When, therefore, it became
apparent that it would meet with the
opposition of some of these parties, I
had no doubt that it ought at once to be
abandoned.
-
I am still however of opinion that
the arrangement is one which it would
be for the interests of the colony to effect.
The continuance of the claims of the
New Zealand Company upon the whole
proceeds of the land revenue, except
that proportion of them which may be
expended on emigration and surveys,
will create so much difficulty in the
management of the Crown Lands and
in the extinction of Native Titles, and
will thus prove so serious an obstacle
to the progress of the Colony, that I
think it would be well got rid of by the
exchange of this claim for debentures on
the terms proposed. -
For although the annual charge
on the resources of the Colony for the
interest on the £200,000 would, no doubt,
be a serious incumbrance, it is to be
remarked on the other hand that the
whole Capital of the Company has been
sunk in forming these Settlements: in
addition to which, large sums advanced
to it by Parliament have been applied to
the same object, as well as annual grants
to a large amount which have afforded
means for carrying on the important
public works which have contributed so
much to the prosperity and peace of the
Colony, without interfering with other
objects. -
Considering the extent of the
advantages thus conferred upon the Set-
tlers, it does not seem that the annual
charge which it was then proposed by way
of commutation to transfer to the General
Revenue, would have been one for
which the settlers would have had to com-
plain that they had not received an ample
return. Nor would the debt, in the form
in which it was thus proposed to esta-
blish it, have proved any more serious
obstacle to the progress of New Zealand
than a debt incurred under somewhat
similar circumstances, and which has
already been in a great measure liqui-
dated, did to that of South Australia. -
The subject must, however, now
be left for the consideration of the Local
Legislatures, with which I have no doubt
that Parliament will be ready to co-ope-
rate for such a purpose.
I have transmitted the Act with a copy
of this despatch direct to Lieutenant-
Next Page →
✨ LLM interpretation of page content
🏛️
Despatch regarding the regulation of New Zealand Company settlements
(continued from previous page)
🏛️ Governance & Central Administration8 August 1851
New Zealand Company, Settlements, Imperial Act, Despatch, Crown Lands, Nelson Trust Fund, Land Revenue, Land Orders, Native Titles
New Munster Gazette 1852, No 1