Correspondence regarding steam mail service




economical manner possible ensure a rapid
and certain means of communication be-
tween the several ports of this colony and
Australia and Great Britain.

  1. This object will most certainly be at-
    tained if the two services were combined,
    and the same vessels ran the whole route;
    the mails for each port would thus, without
    delay, be forwarded by the same boat which
    conveyed them to the colony; while at the
    same time, passengers between Australia
    and the several Provinces would be saved
    the expense, inconvenience, and delay,
    otherwise attendant on a change from one
    vessel to another.

  2. With this view it is advisable that
    tenders for the conveyance of mails—first
    from Sydney to Manukau or Auckland,
    and secondly from the latter ports to
    the ports specified in the draft adver-
    tisement herewith enclosed—should be
    called for simultaneously, with an intima-
    tion that it is the desire of this Govern-
    ment that the two services should if possi-
    ble be combined. Were this accomplished,
    two boats could convey the mails from
    Sydney to Auckland or Manukau, and
    thence round the colony and back to Syd-
    ney; to which port, rather than Melbourne,
    it is desired that the New Zealand steam-
    ers should ply, as being at the same time
    cheaper, ensuring a communication both
    with Melbourne and Sydney (through the
    the English steamers), and affording a
    means of getting direct from New Zealand
    to Sydney, which will in a few months,
    from the cessation of the subsisting ar-
    rangements with the William Denny, be
    otherwise wanting.

  3. The three routes specified in the ad-
    vertisement, for the Inter-Provincial Ser-
    vice, would, in the order in which they are
    respectively numbered, afford the most
    rapid medium for the distribution both of
    the English and New Zealand Mails. Of
    these the first route would effect a saving
    of four days in time over the second, and
    of nearly a fortnight over the third. But
    as some disinclination may be felt on the
    part of the contractors to engage that the
    steamers should leave Manukau at stated
    periods, owing to the possible state of the
    bar during the prevalence of strong west-
    erly gales, the second route may possibly
    be preferred. The third route, although
    affording somewhat more communication
    between the Southern Provinces, is objec-
    tionable from the additional time which
    would be required, thus delaying the trans-
    mission of replies to letters from England
    or Auckland, and increasing, from the time
    involved, the expense of transit. At the
    same time it is advisable that tenders should
    be invited for it in order fairly to test the

question of expense by the various routes
which have been at different times pro-
posed. For the same reason you will per-
ceive that the advertisement invites tenders
for any other route which contractors might
desire to take.

  1. The route indicated in your letter
    would require three boats, none of which,
    however, would be fully employed; while,
    therefore, no one boat would be doing as
    it might, some inconvenience and expense
    would be incurred by passengers, especially
    to and from the southern ports, from the
    necessity of changing from one boat to an-
    other, and of waiting for the arrival of that
    boat in which they were finally to proceed.
    In a smaller degree this objection would
    also apply to the transmission of letters.

  2. As the Government, from the cir-
    cumstances that the decision as to one of
    the two services does not altogether rest
    with it, is precluded without further infor-
    mation from determining absolutely in this
    matter; and as it is most desirable that
    an efficient steam service for New Zealand
    should be secured at as early a period as
    possible; it does not desire that, unless
    unavoidably necessary, any further refer-
    ence should be made to it here, but relies
    on your judgment, after a full considera-
    tion of all the circumstances, to effect
    that arrangement which may be the most
    advantageous to all parts of the colony.
    Should your departure from Australia
    occur before an arrangement can be effect-
    ed, Dr. Campbell, who will remain at
    Sydney and Melbourne for some time, is
    authorised to act on behalf of this Govern-
    ment, either at the Congress of Delegates,
    or otherwise, as occasion may require.

  3. The Government of Victoria has ac-
    cordingly been informed that you, or in
    your absence Dr. Campbell, will represent
    the New Zealand Government in this mat-
    ter.

  4. In concluding any contract it should
    be borne in mind, that with a view to any
    necessary modification of the terms, the
    contract should not be taken for a longer
    period than twelve months; nor must the
    cost of the Inter-Provincial Service ex-
    ceed the sum of £10,000, being the
    amount voted for that service.

  5. It remains to observe that the Go-
    vernment of Victoria may possibly have
    been led to expect, or may for other rea-
    sons desire, that Melbourne should be the
    port of arrival and departure for the New
    Zealand branch service; as this, for the
    reasons stated in paragraph 4, would be
    disadvantageous to New Zealand, it must
    be insisted that Sydney is to be the Port.
    On this question, Tasmania and South Aus-



Next Page →



Online Sources for this page:

PDF PDF Canterbury Provincial Gazette 1857, No 3





✨ LLM interpretation of page content

🚂 Correspondence regarding steam mail service for New Zealand (continued from previous page)

🚂 Transport & Communications
20 November 1856
Steam mail service, Sydney, Melbourne, Inter-Provincial Service, Mail contract, Dr. Campbell
  • Campbell (Dr.), Authorized to act on behalf of the Government